Unmasking 4 ways politics masquerading as science- every minute of every day- is destroying our wealth, our health, our faith our children and our future
The wall of truth separating empirical -measurable observable science is broken. (A "prequel" to the free Broken Wall of Truth in Sciences video series)
Cigarette smoking- how the industry blocked the medical truth for 50 years and why they would have won the battle today
How truth in science is supposed to be established vs. what is happening
Proof the medical and government authorities we trust hide inconvenient truth
Climate change: When you remove politics to expose just the science what do we see?
Covid: Having learned in this document how science should be determined, what happens when you “follow the actual science” with covid?
Evolution: What happens to the evidence when you remove the philosophy component masquerading as science and why this subject is the heart of today’s sense of brokenness
Wrap up: Does the Bible deserve to be restored to its place above democratically elected government, above government laws?
Other sources of news and information for you to consider following
1: originating in or based on observation or experience
2: relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory, an empirical basis for the theory
3:capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment, empirical laws
Now we have a problem. We mustrebuild the wall of truth.
Doing so can give the children in our lives-and ourselves- renewed hope and optimism. Our world will be better when the mask is removed.
Eliminate needless anxiety that weighs us and our children down.
Learn how our daily lives are being diminished by agendas posing as science.
Understand how trusted scientific sources used propaganda techniques to destroy our faith rather than share the measurable observable science which affirms the Bible.
An examination of the issues of the day across the sciences reveals text book examples of deceptive propaganda techniques at work, including extensive fraud.
Respected journals publish multipage full color splashy articles they know to be false planning to retract them, if forced, with a tiny statement.
You ask what’s the benefit of that strategy? The initial article gets picked up and multiplied around the world by all the main stream media because they also accept “The Narrative” but then overlook, intentionally or otherwise, the retraction.
In the past, in the era of only a few decades ago, the world welcomed conflicting narratives. But no longer. Today the most crucial topics of science have been forcibly unified into The Narrative to support the destruction we are witnessing.
This document will map out how and why that is occurring. Knowledge is power. Use it to fight back. We say “Money Talks”. Both money and power have a one word vocabulary: “More”
By the way, I will walk at the slow speed of a defense attorney not a TV show, because-
you have never heard “this side of the story” and have already accepted the other side, The Narrative, as truth. That Narrative, ushered in using fraud and propaganda techniques, is now well entrenched.
Every time you fill up your car or buy groceries you are paying more because of The Narrative’s control of the government and mains stream media. We must not only expose its sham, we must take back the power it has.
I will be using tons of quotes from experts. (My opinion is of little value) I endeavor to use only those who could/have already qualified as courtroom certified experts. (Yes an actual designation) Who/what are they? We associate phrases like “the facts mam, just the facts” from police witness statements in media depictions of a courtroom. That’s because the facts are all the public is allowed to present in a courtroom. But a court certified expert witness is desired for his/her opinion because of his proven and court certified expertise in a given area.
Imagine a world where the auto manufacturers and the auto body repair industry had a political lobby that was so strong, that the facts of the safety of winter snow tires were skewed and repressed.
Cars and lives were needlessly being damaged or destroyed because of the power of the auto industry lobby to crush the truth.
That was the world of the cigarette smoker for 50 years. Politics masqueraded as science obscuring the truth. While there was enough honestly and integrity left in the world to finally bring that truth to the front, our post Bible/Christian society no longer has the strength to do that.
The result is the chaos we are experiencing and our emotional turmoil- the sense surveys are revealing- that people know things are broken but don’t understand how we got to this point and how we can recover.
This document will address that and surprise you with the answers. BTW, this document is an explanatory prequel to my on-line, completely free video series.
Rumble with 7 videos, yes all free. They explain how we got into this ethical mess and lead you through the different sectors of science-based truth that have been manipulated to diminish our lives. (They are number 1-7 with an introductory video. Unfortunately, they do not appear in order on the Rumble channel home page.
Recognizing and Rebuilding the Broken Wall of Truth in the Sciences .
I recently received this letter. Its tone of worry is more like what I would expect from a preacher long ago. But this came from one of my sources of investment information
Dear Friends:
I don’t know about you But I barely recognize our country anymore. Transgenderism, socialism, “woke” capitalism, defunding the police… not long ago you would’ve been laughed out of the room for these ideas.
Today? Refusal to accept them will bring the lynch mob to your door. Dare to speak out against them? You will be canceled. If you’re like me, you have probably watched this shift in America and asked yourself: what on earth is going on?
That’s the question I’ll answer today. My name, by the way, is Porter Stansberry. I’m the founder of one of the world’s largest financial research firms and was among the first to alert the public to many of the alarming trends we see unfolding in America today.
Rampant inflation, lockdowns, riots, protests, debt forgiveness… I warned of it all, years ago. And, while it brings me no joy to say this, despite everything we’ve suffered through over the last several years… the worst is yet to come. You see, our country, economy, and culture are not being turned upside down by accident.
The politicization of everything is part of a plot to “reset” not just your personal wealth, but the entire U.S economic system. It’s a plan meticulously engineered by two of the world’s most powerful men over the last 20 years. Two unelected billionaires who exist outside the checks and balances of Washington D.C, yet wield far more power than any political party. And what they have planned next will terrify you…
Imagine watching an American football game. But suddenly plays are unfolding differently. Why? During ½ time they switched to Canadian football rules. Everything still looks the same. The differences in downs and timing changes the tactics and strategies. While it looks similar its played differently.
While we were busy trying to survive and navigate Covid the game changed. The exact day: March 24, 2020. (I explain that day lower down) You feel it. You see it but you can’t quite put your finger on what has happened.
Josh Alexander Tweet: “I have just been arrested and charged at my Catholic high school for attending class after being excluded for indicating my intent to adhere to my religious beliefs
Look no further than the youth arrested at his school -a catholic school- for speaking out against men using the girl’s washrooms. (In Ontario Canada Catholic schools are paid for by the government)
Or Isabel Vaughan-Spruce standing silently outside a UK abortion clinic, not carrying a placard or any signage, arrested because they knew she was -wait for it- being violent? No -praying. The arresting officer confirmed with her that she was praying in her mind - not even whispering.
Transgender women are suing the medical establishment to get help to transition back. They are discovering that while transitioning was a fast well-oiled machine- no one is there to help them back. They are saying that no one told them of the misery ahead- that they would never have children or even an orgasm. Besides, how would you explain to a pre-puberty girl what that is? As minors they could not legally sign a consent form.
Michelle Zacchigna of Orillia, Ont., who had her breasts and womb removed to change her gender to male, and who is now detransitioning, is suing medical and health practitioners for failing to consider other treatments during her mental health crisis
. PHOTO BY COURTESY OF MICHELLE ZACCHIGNA
“Six months after, she looked back on her life and realized that she was probably never transgender — she was just gender non-conforming, autistic and dealing with trauma. Zacchigna began de-transitioning, but, as she had already had her breasts and uterus removed, aspects of her transition were irreversible…Upon reflection, Zacchigna realized that she had been provided inadequate care. Why did she learn of her autism only years after hormones and surgery? Why hadn’t doctors holistically examined her mental health? Why weren’t alternative treatment options explored”? https://nationalpost.com/opinion/detransitioner-lawsuit-shows-canada-has-room-for-improvement
Do you trust your government at the highest levels and those in-between to be acting in a benevolent manner- to be working in an environment where everyone holds each other accountable to the highest standards of honesty and transparency?
A growing number- can no longer trust the government and medical authorities. Over the past few years-I was forced to see what had been under my nose for decades in my own research. I lost my trust.
And in Canada, according to the government’s own research:
Large mainstream media outlets and “journalists” working for them scored a “high trust” rating of only 18%. trust-Canada
As I created a documentary for television almost two decades ago and in the time since, I was forced to accept that in at least one field of medicine- the government was intentionally acting in a malevolent manner. How? By refusing to mandate the publication of the health risks of an extremely poplar elective medical procedure. One in three women undergo it. The risks are to herself plus high risks to future children of cerebral palsy or autism. But due to politics, the government protects the procedure instead of the health of the woman and her future children. Is that fair? How can anyone say that such a government is benevolent?
But that was just the beginning. As I continued my research, I discovered this malevolency has spread across the major sectors of science-to the detriment of our health, wealth and even our faith.
That is what this new video series is about: The wall of truth separating philosophy masquerading as science from empirical measurable real science, is broken. These lies now permeate every aspect of our lives leading to needless destruction and despair.
What has happened to suddenly change things? If you walk with me, I will explain.
SECTION 1- CIGARETTE SMOKING RISKS BATTLE
Can you imagine a world where a cigarette smoking Fred Flintstone and his friend Barney Rubble were advertising cigarettes to the children watching? (photo above) Where vulnerable and insecure teens were looking at Billboards and TV ads to gorgeous women and chiseled men for guidance on how to “fit in?” Now, with today’s social media multiply that power 100-fold.
Imagine smoking was still occurring in airplanes, restaurants, theaters and elevators while its ill effects were still being disputed by the industry calling for yet more research while trash talking those brave enough to resist?
The first book/study about cigarette smoking’s tragic consequences, A doctor’s Report/Ochsner was deemed “fiction” by the medical “fact checker” of the day.
Are you familiar with the phrase “Big Tobacco”?
Have you ever pondered how the industry was able to suppress the murderous smoking risks for 50 years?
Why was it called “Big Tobacco? Because with their power they were able to buy time while they continued to get millions of new users- children- addicted to their cancer sticks. How did they do it while residing in a country where truth in science was presumably readily apparent? To make a long story short, three ways:
1- Hiring prestigious researchers willing to assemble the statistics in a way that refuted and obfuscated what physicians were seeing with their own eyes: That patients who smoked, died earlier in life.
2- By threatening to pull their massive advertising dollars from medical publications as well as main stream media, they pressured them into not publishing legitimate and damning smoking risks research.
3- By using a myriad of well-established propaganda techniques, they prevented the medical consensus from being accepted by the public.
Why should you care? Because there are new “Big Tobacco’s” that are injuring and killing today- 2023.
I will map them out in this document. They are presented in this new and free video series (The Broken Wall, Nehemiah, & The Lion)
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), spoke of one of the new “Bigs” July 2019, calling it “the most powerful brute in the ranks of Washington power brokers”. Why? Because Big Tobacco in its day could do pretty much as it wanted. Through its apparently endless resources it had the power to promote laws that suited the industry, not laws that benefited the people. Read on and you will be presented with strong evidence that there are now a few new “Big Tobaccos” that need to be exposed and neutralized. How pharma, under attack from all sides, keeps winning in Washington (statnews.com)
But doing that is even more challenging-nigh impossible- than it was when Big Tobacco was finally brought down.
If Big Tobacco had been able to resist until 2020 they would, I expect now be “home free”- still running smoking ads to vulnerable children and teens. Still smoking in theatres etc. You still wouldn’t know for sure that smoking killed. There would be no warnings on the packaging.
The big question is, what was powerful enough to finally kill the cigarette industry by 2010 that no longer has the power to control the false information from the “Bigs”?
A/ At that time the remnants of the Bible/Christian era of honesty at all costs and above all, was strong enough to motivate enough ethical researchers to present the full spectrum of research statistics providing conclusive evidence of smoking’s risks. Evidence shows we no longer have that. (Video #1 Ethics in society dead? Doing the Right Thing https://rumble.com/v20p7go-introduction-to-the-7-videos-in-the-series.html )
B/ The experts of the day who had the courage to speak up were admired. Whereas today, those who resist see their careers ended – their professorships and or medical licenses revoked. They are mocked and isolated by an ever more ruthless and ignorant (of the complexities and nuances) social media mob reportedly fueled by some external powers.
How? Today there is “The Narrative”. Failure to support that Narrative means failure to obtain career mandated research funds. Today, intentional deceitfulness is accepted as necessary and justified to support the greater good of “The Narrative”
Consequently, the wall of truth separating empirical -measurable- observable- science from philosophy masquerading as science is broken. Pseudo science pervades our lives. We accept it as truth to the detriment of our health, our wealth and even our faith. Our children are suffering like no children in peace time ever have. That is because we are in fact at war even though we don’t see bombs being dropping on our cities.
“The Narrative” boilerplate was birthed by philosophers from an earlier century. Friedrich Nietzsche and Georg Freidrich Hegel. Critical Race theory being spread today just filled in the blanks.
Ironically, Nietzsche was a “sincere Christian” who “unleashed the revolutionary idea that the human mind, not God, is the source of certainty; human experience is the fixed point around which everything else revolves” This led to the “death of God” which Friedrich Nietzsche explained, that by giving up the belief in God you must also give up the biblical ideas of morality and meaning. “If we are not created by God and therefore bound by his laws…(then) nobody can tell us what to do with our bodies” . (Pg 119, How Now Shall We Live, Colson/Pearcey) and by extension, anyone else’s body or mind, or resources. This was the foundation for not only the sexual revolution and its accompanying necessity, abortion, but justified whatever those in power wished to accomplish. Ethics became what those in power wished to accomplish.
This was the foundation of the culture of death. It was given additional fuel a few decades ago with fears of the global population outstripping earth’s resources.
Even though time and empirical science have completely refuted those concerns they remain an important part of the foundation of “The Narrative”.
Hegel changed the concept of a static ladder of life which put God at the top to an evolutionary concept in which everything was continually improving in “an endless progress towards perfection…There was great optimism that the best human minds …could lead us forward to utopia—a substitute version of heaven…Hegel’s best known disciple was Karl Marx….(In the present form of Marxism the original repressed factory worker) has been replaced with oppressed women, blacks, homosexuals people of various colors and genders… (who are) called to harness their rage and do battle against their oppressors, usually white male heterosexuals” (Pg 232-233, How Now Shall We Live, Colson/Pearcey.)
“Because Marxism assumes that the reconstruction of social and economic institutions is enough to usher in harmony and peace, it puts no moral restraint on the leaders in the new world order.
Because it does not recognize the need to place checks and balances on the individuals in power, allowing them absolute power. And we all know what absolute power does. Marxism is a substitute religion that wreaks devastation and death.” (Pg 236, How Now Shall We Live, Colson/Pearcey)
Charles Colson penned that 24 years ago. He was entirely prophetic as Marxism has only gained strength.
You can imagine Marx using the phrase “The end justifies the means” and that explains the sense of everything around us being broken. But its not yours or my idea of the desired ends but rather The Narrative’s idea of the utopian ends. Hence the conflict.
If you look you can see change is at work in major sectors of science if not every sector. Because science is such an important and pervasive part of our daily existence we are, not “threatened”- that is a static word- no-
we are daily being pummeled by pseudo-science- philosophy masquerading as science.
Please stay with me and I will walk you through the evidence and you can make up your own mind.
2--HOW SHOULD SCIENCE TRUTH BE ESTABLISHED VS. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS
Ideally everything that has potential to benefit mankind should be funded in accordance to its benefit. Note! You can see how philosophy leaps in quickly. What point of view decides which is more beneficial than something else? i.e. threatened honeybees, a rare toad species, distant space observation? At any rate, an actual physical experiment occurs and comes to a conclusion or numbers-statistics are gathered to create a report. In both cases other scientists in the same field endeavor to enter the discussion as they look at the report. They also try to replicate either the experiment or carefully review the numbers that validate the study.
You have heard the quip, “You can make a study say anything you want”. Indeed by the careful but illicit selection of numbers / data / conditions, that skewing can be accomplished.
One way to help mitigate that skewing is to combine all the studies on a given subject into one study called a “meta-analysis” or meta study. Now with hundreds of studies combined and that many more chart plotting points, additional accuracy and confidence is achieved. (You will hear the term Meta-analysis in the Broken wall video on Censorship)
What else to we do ideally? Science is not to ever be considered “settled”. This allows for some new information to be discovered that would legitimately overturn prior assumptions. Consensus does not establish truth in real science. Good scientists do not suppress debate they insist on it. Consensus is there to be challenged. It improves the accuracy of the science.
In reality how are we doing? Very very poorly. Today, a scientist who objects, instead of being given the “microphone” is threatened with job loss. So to survive he/she must publish that which supports the consensus- a consensus that is not necessarily a consensus at all. And not necessarily correct science. That contrived, forced, consensus becomes embedded in The Narrative. Consequently the mechanisms that existed in the past that caught errors- intentional or otherwise, has been shut down.
John Loannidis, professor of disease prevention at Stanford University warned in 2005 that
Did accuracy improve after his warning? No. In 2010 the Center for Scientific Integrity that 500 to 600 retractions of published false research per year was occurring. In 2012 the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences stated “67.4%” of the time it was due to “misconduct” and that
“fraud has increased tenfold since 1975. Do you see the trend? In 2016 LiveScience reported more than 650 scientific papers were retracted.
But although a paper may be retracted it gets legs from the initial publication and those legs keep the false science walking onwards through other media supporting “The Narrative”. Eventually a lie is accepted as truth because the public have heard it so many times from a variety of sources and not ever seen the buried rebuttal. (I give examples of this in my documentary in the Broken Wall series about Censorship)
So you can understand why I say the sense of ethics and integrity that applauded rather than censored debate which brought down Big Tobacco, is now gone. Other “Bigs” have filled in the power vacuum and we are suffering. https://creation.com/creation-magazine-451-contents Exposing counterfeit science
SECTION 3 – BIG ABORTION: Abdicating Their Legal and Ethical Obligation of Informed Consent
Abortion Risks: Clockwise from top left: Cerebral Palsy, Preterm birth, depression and suicide, breast cancer
What industry has the power of Big Tobacco to rise above all existing science and ensure that the laws of western nations completely ignore what is incontrovertible evidence-
not just according to the published peer reviewed reports but validated by judges and juries as well? What has the power to completely ignore the foundational medical laws of ethics as well as the written laws of informed consent? Big Abortion.
A quick note to pro-choicers who are reading this and are uncomfortable with anything that might impede a woman’s right to choose: Health wise if she is not ready to start or add to her family she should bring the baby to term and give it up for adoption. Why? When all the medical data is included not just the “convenient” data, health wise, electing to have an abortion is never the best option for a woman’s long term or short-term health.
Carrying the baby to term at a young age imparts health benefits such as helping her breasts resist cancer later in life- no cancer expert refutes that.
The “abortion via a coat hangar in the back alley by amateurs so don’t make it illegal” is a myth perpetrated by movies like Dirty Dancing. (Even in that movie it is a rogue although qualified physician who botches the abortion leading to what we are to assume is a hemorrhage- the most common risk,) Fully qualified physicians were doing them. But were the outcomes sometimes like the back-alley coat hangar myth? Yes. Hemorrhage (excessive bleeding) is one of the risks of abortion and can kill. (For those unfamiliar with this information battle please watch Videos #5 and 6, https://rumble.com/c/c-1481621, or https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/LfJNOOBZew6r/ )
20 years ago I felt compelled to take my video production company to make a documentary, in conjunction with any of our television networks who would cooperate, about the courtroom validated health risks to the woman having an abortion. I thought that regardless of one’s point of view on the ethics of abortion-
our pro-women, pro-truth culture wants to warn women of the health risks to the woman. Informed consent is not just the ethical and right thing to do- its the law.
But for two decades every network has refused to tell this important truth. I could not understand why. I was confident that a documentary about the most common medical procedure claimed to be safer than having a penicillin injection but in reality, increasing a woman’s risk of breast cancer and suicide would be an extremely well watched documentary.
Why would an otherwise pro-women culture turn against women – and children?
Why would YouTube and Google rather have children born with Cerebral Palsy and Autism than help me and others share the information of abortion health risks?
After nearly two decades, I understood. All the mainstream media support “The Narrative”. Thanks to the work of Robert Epstein I also saw that Google and YouTube are not “neutral”. They too support it. Why? Abortion enables the foundational narrative of less population. At 93%, Google and YouTube can be said to completely control “The Narrative”. The next largest search engine Bing, has just 3.03 % . (Other browsers are using Google or Bing, except Mojeek which is independent and neutral)
To quote Epstein, that’s “more power than Hitler or any dictator ever had”.
I just finished a new documentary (#2, Censored…) that answers the burning question: Why, after decades of battling to move the health risks of Induced Abortion into the mainstream media, have we failed to “move the needle” where it counts the most: The doorway to the abortion clinic. Look at what Canada’s own Morgentaler abortion clinics say while professing to give women the information “she deserves”.
(As of January 30, 2023,
http://www.morgentaler.ca/
Fact or Fiction: Every woman deserves the chance to make an informed decision about her pregnancy. And that means getting the facts.
· Abortion causes breast cancer FALSE
· Abortion makes ectopic (tubal) pregnancies more likely FALSE
· There is a medical condition called Post Abortion Stress Syndrome FALSE
· Abortion is 10 times safer than giving birth (by 18th week) TRUE
· Abortion is safer than having your tonsils out. TRUE.
(Note- I see March 11, 2023 the above page is gone. The same link directs to a new website https://twclinic.ca/faq and a lawyer approved FAQ section which gives the impression of safety by a careful selection of data )
This new documentary is a “retrospective” in the sense that it reviews the health risks identified more than 10 years ago by the esteemed researchers featured in my first two documentaries and provides answers to the question of why we haven’t moved this damming body of knowledge resisted by the disingenuous, into the mainstream.
If the knowledge was mainstream, it would be helping to protect children in the pro-abortion states and nations as well as undergirding the wisdom of overturning Roe V. Wade.
This new documentary lets our research and legal experts explain how this truth was being repressed more than a decade ago and then uncovers the main source of the current and extremely powerful tool of repression. Video #2 Censored: The 4 Ways Trusted Medical Authorities Censor Medical Truth. (I would rather you start at the beginning of the series as it lays the foundation but here is #2; https://rumble.com/v1k4f1z-censored-the-4-ways-trusted-medical-authorities-censor-medical-truth.html
If you are still doubting the truthfulness of the medical risks of abortion to the woman you can be forgiven. We all have tended to believe the media- so if they aren’t revealing this information how can we be sure it’s true?
How can we be sure the governments of the world know of these risks?
Many decades ago the American government set up its own library where its legislators and governors could turn for objective transparent facts in science: National Academy of Sciences.
The library has a book dedicated to Preterm Birth. Why? Aren’t tiny babies rather cute? No. They are tragic. An “extremely premature” baby- the category caused by the mother having a prior abortion, has a 50% chance of death. If it survives it will have a disability. Maybe Cerebral Palsy or Autism. The cost to the marriage is a likely divorce plus massive medical bills .
So the mom is left alone as she juggles endless bills and specialists appointments.
The cost to the medical insurance companies and the government is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The government's own book warns of preterm birth risks. Why doesn't the government?
Does the FDA demand warnings of this politically sensitive health risk? No. It only warns of the politically safe contributors to Pre Term Birth: Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol.
Notice that cigarette smoking and alcohol during pregnancy are in those lists, Table B-7, so the government knew what was there.
From the government's own library, item 3
But in the FDA’s refusal to list elective abortion as a contributor to Autism and Cerebral Palsy through preterm birth, the Main Stream Media (MSM) narrative of pro-choice regardless of health risks is maintained.
The government warns of items 2 and 5. Why not abortion risks in TABLE B-5
But the problem of preterm birth is so severe- so costly researchers around the world continued to research it.
Award winning Canadian Dr. Prakesh S Shah, (Neonatologist and Clinical Epidemiologist, Associate Professor, Departments of Paediatrics and HPME, University of Toronto , Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario) noticing a great and continuing increase in the-
highly dangerous births of premature and underweight babies did a major study covering nearly one million births to determine if there was an identifiable cause.
He discovered one; The side effect of one of the world’s most common elective medical procedures. If he had found that say, drinking too much apple juice during pregnancy was the culprit, he would have been hailed as a hero and his own hospital would have featured his research on their brag page as they did for their other researchers but no-
the culprit was induced abortion, the medically preferred method to terminate a pregnancy. The research discovered “that in women who had undergone more than one abortion, there was a 72% increased risk for low birth weight and 93% for prematurity”.
He called a press conference. No one came from Canada, the USA, or anywhere else in the world. The MSM does not want to carry any story that might interfere with “The Narrative”, in this case, a woman’s right to an abortion. Only the proudly independent UK Guardian carried the story. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/sep/16/abortion-risk-weight-premature-study
Premature babies are such a tragedy that 3 more meta-analysis have been done searching for the cause. They also confirmed the same risks of an induced abortion. BTW, a meta-analysis gathers all other studies on the topic into one larger study to make it more reliable. Here are the 4.
Shah PS, Zao J. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm Birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2009;116:1425-1442. [URL:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02278.x/pdf ]
Swingle HM, Colaizy TT, Zimmerman MB, et al Abortion and the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reproductive Med 2009;54:95-108. [ URL: http://johnrodgerssmith.com/MedicalObservations/Swingle/JRM%20Swingle%20paper%202009.pdf ]
Lemmers M, Vershoor MA, Hooker AB, Opmeer BC, Limpens J, Huirne JA, Ankum WM, Mol BW. Does dilation and curettage (D & C) increase the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. [Abstract URL: http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/11/02/humrep.dev274.abstract
Saccone G, Perriera L, Berghella V. Prior uterine perforation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Amer J Obstetrics Gynecology May 2016;214(5):572-591 http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(15)02596-X/abstract
There are many other life changing risks to a woman in electing to have an induced abortion not the least of which is emotional trauma to the woman. She knows she is “killing her baby not a frog” to quote one post abortion woman in my documentary, “Video #6, The Hidden Emotional Risks of Abortion”
If you are somewhat knowledgeable about the two main abortion options you might realize suction abortion is the physician preferred technique because they can be surer of procedural success. The other method is drug induced using Mifepristone or equivalent. Studies on rats suggest that this procedure for terminating the pregnancy is no healthier for the woman: “The findings of our study highlight the potential for negative health implications in women undergoing drug-induced pregnancy termination.
In our model, we observed behaviors that are recognized as indicators of negative well-being (unhealthy) in the rats. These included a lack of interest in eating, a hunched posture, reduced grooming, and potential anxiety- and depression-like behaviors.
In the real world of a woman using it herself what happens? Mifepristone, is concerning to physicians - in part because the woman undergoes it without medical expertise or care.
If our survey of mifepristone AERs is representative of adverse event reporting for all drugs, the American public should be greatly alarmed. In this instance, a majority of the AERs analyzed do not provide enough information to accurately code the severity of the adverse event in question. The deficiencies were so egregious in some instances as to preclude analysis. It is clear that input quality control is necessary for Medwatch to function; this systemic deficiency clearly impairs the FDA’s ability to fully assess mifepristone’s safety profile because the necessary signals are not being generated.https://www.aaplog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/MifeSAEharrison-pdf-copy.pdf
The most frequent AERs (Adverse events reports) were hemorrhage, infection Including septic shock leading to death
but it is perceived to be a great way for a woman to do her own abortion and some are trying to make it more widely available despite the life threatening dangers. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64762907
If you “fact check” what I am saying you will likely end up reading a rebuttal of these health concerns because the official professional body in the USA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has become a political not science based organization. But if you have the patience to dig deeper you will realize that, consistent with what I am saying in this document- that-
the professional associations which regulate their professional members have been taken over by political “The Narrative” goals.
Those goals are ranked more important than the patient care their own documentation likely states as their purpose.
Leadership has never surveyed the membership on this issue
Repeatedly, when the adults mess up it’s the children who suffer the most.
War.
Divorce.
Abortion
Hiding the truth of cigarette smoke and smoking.
Living in fear of global warming, violent storms. Animals dying.
But its not just the children being impacted. Have you stopped to ponder that virtually all the things and experiences that give you comfort and pleasure are being abolished because of climate “experts”. A trip? Car or airplane? Both a contributors to climate change and a waste. A vacation home? A hot shower? Cold air conditioning? A steak on your BBQ? Power boat? Your 2000 square foot house? Too big! You should live in a tent. In a tent you can help the climate because you will have a smaller “carbon footprint” and you won’t add emissions as you paint the walls or replace the carpet or furniture. And a tent of leaves not nylon because that’s carbon based.
Even a sailboat requires carbon to be built. You haven’t heard those radical thoughts spelled out because The Narrative writers are clever enough to know that an important principle of persuasion is to not push radical ideas too soon. (The Catalyst: How to Change Anyone’s Mind, Berger. Pg.89)
But because carbon is the new DDT poison, everything that involves carbon needs to be eliminated. Of course that’s impossible and indeed destructive, but that doesn’t stop the rhetoric.
Have you had some interesting dinner table conversations about global warming? In my experience, perhaps yours also- there is always at least one – what can we politely call him- “nutcase?” who believes very differently than you to the extreme and is adamant about his position. (Whatever that position is) He insists on shutting down all discussion.
Now let’s imagine such a conversation where he is declaring that global warming has got so bad that we all must instruct our surgeons to use less “gas” the next time we are “under” for some surgery. Really? Yes really! I am not making this up- I wish I was!
“Doctors at Henry Ford Health System (Michigan USA) are cutting back the use of anesthesia. They say the gasses used in anesthesia are harmful for the environment
At the very end of their article they admit to this one minor “detail” . There are risks from not receiving enough anesthesia too, though…A person could always wake up during surgery, which can be painful and highly traumatic.”
Imagine waking up- screaming in pain- ripping out the wires and tubes attached to you and thereby destroying the careful work of the surgeons? There are reasons anesthesiologists have developed careful protocols related to your body size so that you do NOT wake up. (It was once my job to replace tanks of Nitrous oxide (N2O) during surgeries so I learned a little of the extreme caution and seriousness of anesthesiology )
So may I ask if we can now call this hospital’s suggestion “climate extremism”?
Tragically we see again when delving into the issue of climate that supporting The Narrative is more important than the measurable and observable in science.
Please walk with me for a minute. For the sake of the children.
“Overpopulation is a major cause of most of the world’s problems… Our planet can offer a quality of life comparable to that enjoyed in the European Union to no more than 2 billion people”.(We are almost at 8 billion now) https://www.overpopulationawareness.org/en/
Is it possible that our proverbial “nutcase” is now actually in charge of the governments and media and has shutdown all discussion? Yes. Why do I say that?
There is no dispute that the world was much warmer 1000 years ago-
and some say healthier and more prosperous because of its warmth. That is literally why the Norse called today’s ice-covered Greenland, Greenland.
A few hundred years after that discovery, the earth’s temperature started cooling leading to expanding glaciers (and the ice covered “Greenland” we know today) that thankfully started retreating. We should be glad they did or the headlines would be reading “Ice age by 2030”. That was the fear in the 1970s. (No I am not referring to the false meme. I was there in the 70s and remember the headlines.) By 1979 the warming seemed to have started again inspiring the very misleading and refuted hockey stick shaped chart. But there is no hockey stick shaped rise in temperature occurring despite being promised in Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth.
“Extraordinarily expensive policies have, however, been implemented and more are being proposed in the name of the hypothesis under the banner of “net zero,” … The OLS regression estimate of the trend in the Australian high-summer average temperature over the 44 years of available satellite readings is 0.025ºC per century.
That is less than 1/100 — one-hundredth of the rate of warming we have been told by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and by politicians and the media, that we should be worried about.
With a relationship between the passage of time—and by implication the increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide—and temperature so weak, it is not surprising that the statistical association as measured by the R-squared is 0.0000.
But reality--measurable observable empirical science doesn’t stop governments around the world from using that philosophy masquerading as science to impose carbon taxes and legislate electric vehicles far faster than the 30 years or so the world needs to get electric vehicle battery production increased with ethically supplied raw materials.
Most production of a key element comes from the Congo where children, too poor to afford government school fees, wearing flip flops scramble with picks to gather the dangerous raw materials. -
The mad rush to meet a nearly 600 percent increase in the cobalt needed for electric cars over the next decade, means no one knows how much “blood cobalt” is in each electric car. The known ethical sources like Australia can supply only enough for our phones and laptops-not electric vehicles.
And the height of irony? Germany, proudly setting an example of “green” for the world to follow, spurning nuclear, coal and even natural gas fired electrical generation, discovered that when the wind doesn’t blow the wind farms don’t generate electricity.
So they are literally bulldozing a windfarm and a town to dig up more coal.
Can you name any two academic institutions more respected than Princeton and MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) . Here is what two of their professors who have spent decades in this field said:
There are already many “Net Zero” regulations and actions by the Federal government, with more to come, to eliminate fossil fuels and CO2 emissions.
A small sample includes 13 Federal agencies that comprise the U.S. Global Climate Research Program (USGCRP) that is developing a 5th National Climate Assessment, regulations imposing a Social Cost of Carbon of $51 per ton and soon likely to be $190 per ton, carbon disclosure requirements by many federal agencies and a looming ban on gas stoves, furnaces and other gas appliances.
We (Happer and Lindzen) are career physicists who have specialized in radiation physics and dynamic heat transfer for decades. These are processes integral to atmospheric climate science.
In our scientific opinion, all of these “Net Zero” regulations and actions are scientifically invalid and fatally flawed science because they:
A. Fabricate data or omit data that contradicts their conclusions, for example, on extreme weather.
B. Rely on models that do not work.
C. Rely on IPCC findings, which are government opinions, not science.
D. Omit the extraordinary social benefits of CO2 and fossil fuels.
E. Omit the disastrous consequences of reducing fossil fuels and CO2 emissions to “Net
Zero”.
F. Reject the science that demonstrates there is no risk of catastrophic global warming
caused by fossil fuels and CO2
As to the disastrous consequences of eliminating fossil fuels, it “is estimated that nitrogen fertilizer [derived from fossil fuels] now supports approximately half of the global population.”
As one of us (Happer) has made clear, without the “use of inorganic fertilizers” derived from fossil fuels, the world “will not achieve the food supply needed to support 8.5 to 10 billion people.”
The recent experience in Sri Lanka provides a red alert. “The world has just witnessed the collapse of the once bountiful agricultural sector of Sri Lanka as a result of government restrictions on mineral fertilizer.” The government of Sri Lanka banned the use of fossil fuel derived nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides, with disastrous consequences on food supply there. If similarly misguided decisions are made eliminating fossil fuels and thus nitrogen fertilizer, there will be a starvation crisis worldwide. https://co2coalition.org/publications/challenging-net-zero-with-science-lindzen-happer-co2-coalition-paper-released/
Did you notice the tricks used in item A,C,E,F- the same tricks to skew the measurable observable science used in the abortion risks cover up. And trick A was used for decades by the Cigarette industry to delay acknowledgement of its health risks.
Is the misery shared equally? No! The uber wealthy do not suffer. Only those of moderate wealth and below do.
“Sri Lankan scientists and agriculture experts had warned of dire consequences for many crops, such as cocoa, coffee, soybeans, and other staples. In Sri Lanka, rice production dropped 20 percent in the six months after the organic-only policy was implemented. Instead of feeding itself, the country spent $450 million on rice imports. The production of tea, which is the country’s biggest export, fell by 18 percent. The population of Sri Lanka is now facing imminent starvation. https://mustreadalaska.com/trudeau-moving-ahead-to-severely-curtail-use-of-fertilizer-to-address-climate-change-with-more-organic-farming/
Instead of learning from this, another of the worlds breadbaskets, Canada, led by Dear Leader Justin Trudeau, is legislating a 30% reduction in the use of fertilizer. The consequence? “Farmers also say this will result in less food being produced by Canada and will lead to food shortages at a time when there are already global food shortages”. You can read that as “Increased food prices” for you and me.
Beyond comprehension is that his party remains in power only with the support of the party which claims to represent the poor and oppressed (NDP) People are getting squeezed as everything from housing to medication gets more expensive. We’ll put a stop to skyrocketing prices and make sure young people can build a good life. https://www.ndp.ca/commitments#pillar1
And maybe you say, “but its necessary”- but to accomplish just what?
Is Carbon bad? No. Its free fertilizer to the earth’s greenery and its impact on global warming is not at all settled. Satellites are measuring the increase in green cover just as scientists measure the increase in carbon, and notably in the more arid regions!
‘Not being told of that, are we?
Tragically the subject of global warming is a massive emotional burden to our children but is the fear justified? Are the animals dying? Have we caused run-away warming? Or, is it like the courtroom validated health risks of abortion- a far healthier and truthful alternative narrative that is completely hidden because it fails to support “The Narrative”?
When you take the mask off the philosophy masquerading as science and look at the empirical- measurable observable science, there is a picture of great hope. So when will we stop burdening our children and our economy?
We need the established media to help communicate the real not pseudo science- organizations like the trusted National Geographic could be helpful. Are they? I took a look through a recent issue received as a Christmas gift. “Pictures of the Year” December 2022
But instead of being helpful to real science, it took every opportunity to promote “The Narrative” and climate fear.
For example, on page 8 it has a specular photograph of a new volcano, “the most destructive in the Canary Islands in 500 years”. That would have been a good segue to a climate change discussion by pointing out that volcanoes continue to release a staggering amount of heat inside the earth’s core -both as visible volcanoes and undersea volcanoes which can be even larger.
How about the elephants? (Page 118). They are photographed mingling with cattle at a dump in the countryside. For sure we would all rather have them in the wilds of a savannah.
But tell the rural farmers in Sri Lanka that the “6000 pachyderms living in close contact with people” should be allowed to continue to multiply and trample the crops that feed the villagers and the cities.
So the National Geographics, while marveling at the “master generalists, capable of eating at least a hundred different plants,” fearfully adds that “Researchers are tracking levels of cortisol-a stress hormone that could be detrimental to the elephants’ health”.
If they were actually measuring the cortisol, they could have made a quick phone call to any zoo asking the normal cortisol level and then reported something like, “We measured the stress levels -the elephants are doing fine” but that would be undermining The Narrative of “humans are the bad animals”. “The Narrative” says its better to have the humans needing that land, go hungry.
I expect they actually did that research hoping to find a story of elevated cortisol stress and failed. I say that because in an upcoming section of this document I give you an insight into how far National Geographics will go to support “The Narrative”. Hint- fraud.
Let’s pause for a moment though.
Think about the complexity of measuring say the claimed millimeters per decades changes in the earths ocean levels. The tide comes in and then goes out. There are phases of the month and year when the tides are higher and lower.
Which measurement do you use and physically speaking how do you measure? The result is that there is a massive amount of adjusting of the data and assumptions to try to answer that question-enough adjusting that it can easily be skewed towards “The Narrative”.
Scientists say the oceans in the past have been both higher (5.5 meters) and lower (122 meters) than today with nothing more than speculation as to what causes this. (The iceage/s) But you and I are “happily” paying hundreds, even thousands more each year in carbon taxes and increased fuel and heating costs to try to stop nature? The coastline of the eastern U.S. changes....slowly. | U.S. Geological Survey (usgs.gov)
What about all the thousands of land-based weather stations? Of course, we must eliminate those near cities and expanding villages because being surrounded by heated and cooled homes and cars makes a difference to the near-by thermometer.
But the challenge is that we are measuring over decades. Equipment breaks and must be replaced and recalibrated as that is done. Again, there is room for error because we are trying to measure infinitesimally small changes over time on top of daily and seasonally massive changes. i.e. measuring 1/10 of one degree over time but changing 100 degrees summer to winter.
After Al Gore’s promise of a rapidly heating earth about to reach the tipping point of exploding increases-
he was offered a public bet to monitor the increases over the following 10 years, (starting 2007) He refused the bet. Good thing as he would have lost. The increase was zero.
However the organization that bet him is carrying on in the interest of science to do their best with accuracy and transparency. If I understand it, they report now about 1/10 the Al Gore projected increase. Hardly a tipping point and that slight increase can be wiped out over the next few years. So far in 2023 its colder globally.
The point I am making is that thoroughly comprehending this is above the “pay grade” of most of us. We need scientists who will do their best to put their science out in the open where others can review their data.
The good news is that we have such scientists. The bad news is that since they don’t support The Narrative, the mainstream media dismiss them while the government collecting extra taxes-
every time we fill our cars or pay our natural gas bill for heating our house or operating a gas stove. It is a tax bill without justification from what empirical measurable science appears to reveal.
“The pattern of recent global warming underscores the validity of what meteorologists widely recognize: the oceans are the vital inertial and thermal flywheels of the climate system. The corollary is, if one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans. Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain. (Rethinking the Greenhouse Effect William Kininmonth Note 34, The Global Warming Policy Foundation) see Reports - The Global Warming Policy Foundation (thegwpf.org)
Companies that want to continue to supply natural gas or oil for the 20 years or more the experts say it will take to convert to electricity, are losing funding and the ability to borrow because the pseudo science and corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) is shutting of financing. This is causing a shortage of fuel. The resultant higher prices are applauded by those who won’t look at the destruction being caused. Who is ultimately paying for the fact that trucking companies are paying 2 to 3x more for fuel? You and I are every time we buy something. Are you really happy to be paying so much more to solve a problem that isn’t solvable with taxation?
One last concern: Isn’t climate change causing the increase in horrific hurricanes and other radical weather?
You have, presumably in reading this far, grasped how utterly easy and typical it is to skew data- to make it say what you wish- to support The Narrative. A researcher is forced to do this in order to get the necessary funding to pay the bills. And, publishing is necessary to get that sought after professorship. But to get published you must support the narrative.
While that fact is not new, in our post Bible/Christian era, in the collapse of the resistance to lying, those who resist the narrative are crushed rather than admired as in the days of exposing the horrific lies of the cigarette industry. That took enormous willpower. But no physician lost his/her license for fighting that narrative. But today they lose their licensees for fighting narratives like Covid and big Pharma (next section) But just before we get there lets look at the increase in the number and intensity of hurricanes.
Michael Shellenberger writes, Media Lying About Climate And Hurricanes, It's time to state the obvious. Oct 4, 2022:
Over the last several weeks, many mainstream news media outlets have claimed that hurricanes are becoming more expensive, more frequent, and more intense because of climate change.
· The Financial Times reported that “hurricane frequency is on the rise.”
· The New York Times claimed, “strong storms are becoming more common in the Atlantic Ocean.”
· The Washington Post said, “climate change is rapidly fueling super hurricanes.”
· ABC News declared, “Here’s how climate change intensifies hurricanes.”
The increasing cost of hurricane damage can be explained entirely by more people and more property in harm’s way. Consider how much more developed Miami Beach is today compared to a century ago. Once you adjust for rising wealth, there is no trend of increasing damage.
It is notable that journalists twist themselves into pretzels to create the impression that hurricanes are increasing in frequency and intensity without ever acknowledging the data showing that they are not. A simple graph of U.S. landfalls shows that. And yet no major media outlet has ever, to my knowledge, published it.
The Version 6 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for January 2023 was -0.04 deg. C departure from the 1991-2020 mean. This is down from the December 2022 anomaly of +0.05 deg. C.
March 24,2020: The day America fell and your physician was taken captive
This topic is still so fresh. Our emotions are so raw. It’s the most divisive issue in generations as it ripped apart families, friends and churches. The pain is still being felt. I have friends who are still getting Covid although fully “boostered”. Yet this topic is critically important. It can’t wait for a future moment when our emotions are diminished.
You may be really struggling to stay with me as I stretch your trust. Hopefully you have tracked with me as I have exposed the tricks and strategies used against the truth in empirical -measurable observable science; The successful quest to expose smoking risks. The unsuccessful quests since. Abortion risks. Climate change. I have been asking you to suspend what everyone and the MMS media around you is saying. However, if you really can’t hang on till the end, break off and watch my documentary, # 2 Censored The 4 ways trusted medical authorities censor medical truth, where you will hear court certified experts far more knowledgeable than myself. There you will see examples of the power “greater than Hitler even dreamed of” that is now in control of The Narrative. https://rumble.com/v1k4f1z-censored-the-4-ways-trusted-medical-authorities-censor-medical-truth.html (You might notice it is NOT on YouTube. That’s because it “bites the hand that feeds it”)
August 30, 2023 update: A former Canadian Broadcasting Corp. journalist reported being blocked from publishing the truth: “I know that as a public broadcaster, you’d expect us to be telling you the truth, and we stopped doing that,” said Klowak.
“And it was a number of stories that I have put forward that were blocked, but it seemed to me as a journalist who’d been there 34 years, it’s like the rules had changed overnight. And it changed so quickly that it left me just dizzy.”
Klowak noted that it was her editors who prevented her from doing stories in relation to protests against the COVID mandates, as well as reports of people having adverse events to the COVID shots, as reported by doctors.
She noted she had “witnessed in a very short time the collapse of journalism, news gathering, investigative reporting,” adding that the way she “saw it” is that
“we were in fact pushing propaganda.”
“Not only had we shut down one side by silencing and discrediting anyone opposing the narrative, we had elevated and designated ourselves as gatekeepers of the truth. We no longer believed our audience was capable of thinking for themselves,” she told the NCI.
Covid: Because it is so raw and divisive, please just let me ask 13 questions-
after I share a letter from someone who was at ground zero: Dr. Steven Hatfill MD, a specialist physician and recognized Virologist, was brought into the White House as an outside medical advisor February 2020. (That’s within a week or two of Covid 19 hitting America)
“From a front-row seat, I watched in disbelief as a small number of senior federal employees defied orders and their oaths… to systematically ignore and destroy a validated National Pandemic Response Plan-
that had its origins and testing in 2000 crafted into its final form in 2005, and updated in 2017…In legal documents Bright admits to insubordination to multiple layers of leadership including the White House, HHS Secretary Azar, and Robert Kadlec, M.D., Assistant HHS Secretary for Preparedness and Readiness. ( Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 26 Number 3 Fall 2021, The Intentional Destruction of the National Pandemic Plan Steven J. Hatfill, M.D) (In) 2017 – The 2005 Health and Human Services’ (HHS) National Pandemic Plan is updated. The specific responsibilities of local authorities, states, and the federal government have been clearly stated. The national plan is to use early, outpatient antiviral drug treatment, home quarantine, and case contact tracing to cover the “vaccine gap” (the time needed to develop a vaccine to combat any pathogen). https://drstevenhatfill.com/open-letter-to-america/
After the arrival of Covid in America, although this plan was working -saving covid lives and keeping the covid sick out of the hospital using an existing proven safe and effective antiviral, due to insubordination from high ranking staff, the plan was overturned:
This overthrow of the pre-established authority (HHS) that was successfully handling the pandemic planned for happened-
March 24, 2020. The real misinformation started that day--misinformation that opened the door to unprecedented misery and the financial loss-
most of us have experienced since. That day the safe and effective plan that was working was not only trashed and quickly made illegal for use in many areas-
for the first time ever, Physicians were being controlled by outside organizations and blocked from utilizing existing proven safe pharmaceuticals to treat their sick patients.
Yes this is beyond comprehension. Why did it occur? The answer is outside the scope of this paper but we can be certain medical authorities we trusted will be going to jail because the facts are beyond dispute. There is no “he-said-she-said” standoff because of a situation where the truth cannot be established. This is black and white. I invite you to read the full letter at the above link, “Open letter to America” https://rairfoundation.com/health-minister/
My 13 questions:
1. 420%:Are you concerned about the highly visible event of athletes in top physical condition suddenly dropping dead -all being televised to millions?
2. Are you concerned about the health of pregnant women and their babies as the safety data shows problems?
US gov’t data reveals shocking miscarriage, still birth rates after COVID jab compared to flu vaccine. ‘The pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, [and] maybe [in the history of] humanity,’ Dr. James Thorp told Tucker Carlson….“We have never, ever broken the sacrosanct golden rule of pregnancy, never, ever,” he told the Fox News host, explaining that it is a medical “golden rule to never allow unknown substances to ever be used in pregnancy.”…. Recognizing the “danger threshold” used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC of a “two-fold or greater” increase indicating “abnormal” outcomes, the physician reported, “We found a 1200-fold increase in severe menstrual abnormalities, a 57-fold increase in miscarriage, [and] a 38-fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth rates. We found 15 other major pregnancy complications, all far exceeding the CDC and the FDA values of safety.” https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v2https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-govt-data-reveals-shocking-miscarriage-still-birth-rates-after-covid-jab-compared-to-flu-vaccine/
3. Does it bother you that the lockdowns that occurred around the world were not part of the government’s plan, had never been tested as a way to stop the spread and that even as they failed to stop the spread that they kept being repeated?
An assessment is made. If a disproportionate number of people are damaged or killed relative to the benefit of the drug or vaccine it either fails to gain approvals or if already approved, is pulled from the shelves . So far, About 2.3 million adverse event reports were collected against ∼6000 marketed drugs between 1969 and 2002 (19). Yet, only a small proportion (75 drugs; ∼1%) of these marketed drugs were withdrawn during this period. Another study reported that ∼95 drugs were documented to be withdrawn due to death as the primary reason between 1950 and 2013 (17). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702851/
He further pointed out that ordinarily, before a drug comes to market, it must undergo at least four years’ minimum of research and development, including two years of safety studies, at least a year of preclinical studies, and a year of manufacture. Whereas the COVID shot has a measly 2 1/2 months of safety data.
“So if really bad things were to happen, say, six months after the [shot], the manufacturers know that they didn’t have the data. No one has the data,” Yeadon noted.
5. Does it bother you to see little children in masks? Health wise masks also carry risks?
Do you have difficulty relying or receiving verbal information through someone masked? Does it bother you that the same organizations that tell you to mask had earlier quoted science saying they don’t help? That’s why the flip flop on masking people complained about. They didn’t work then and don’t work now to prevent the spread of covid or flu etc. because the covid bug is far too tiny to be caught by the mask designed for water droplets. (a mosquito being blocked with a chain link fence is one analogy) Does it bother you that the entire 6-foot distancing was similarly contrived?
6. If the covid vaccine was so successful at stopping Covid why did the definition of what a vaccine does have to be watered down September 1, 2021,
to the point of it now including store-bought yogurt? Did the authorities want yogurt to be considered a vaccine of did they want to hide the evidence that their billion-dollar forced vaccination program wasn’t working?
Receiving his 4 doses: Dr. Byram W. Bridle, an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph
May 4, 2023 update- The Pfizer data used to justify the forced vaccinations - data that the FDA tried to lock away for 75 years but was forced to be released- has been poured over by a team of thousands and presented in by Naomi Wolf. The top of the list of 11 is that the “vaccine” increased your risk of getting covid 19. This was known by Pfizer Nov. 2020. (called negative efficacy)
Does it concern you that the vaccine mandates and passports were based on the assurance that vaccination stopped the spread of Covid 19- a claim never actually made? Did the Covid vaccine manufacturers ever claim that it had tested for that? Here is the answer given by Pfizer to the European Parliament’s Corona Committee. (Answer: “No” Pfizer: Not tested to prevent transmission “because we had to move at the speed of science”.)
10, Unprecedented 40% Increase in Deaths Since the Rollout of the COVID-19 Vaccines
Are you troubled by the insurance companies report who saw, as they have carefully gathered statistics over decades of World War 1, 2, Korea, Vietnam etc., an unprecedented spike of deaths that coincided with the arrival of “the safe and effective” covid vaccines? https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2022/01/13/4966/
11. Does it matter that the inventor of the Covid test stated it could not be used in isolation to accurately report infection.
12. Have you pondered the difference between fighting Big Tobacco and Big Pharma?
Experts fighting Big Tobacco didn’t loose their medical licenses for challenging the accepted narrative- for being the sources of the “misinformation” of the day. Recall from SECTION 1- CIGARETTE SMOKING RISKS BATTLE that the first book about smoking risks was mocked in the reviews as “fiction” Source: 50th Anniversary of the US Surgeon General's Report: Perspectives on Smoking & Health Blowing Smoke: The Lost Legacy of the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health, ALAN BLUM, MD1, pg. 418 ONCOLOGY • May 2014, cancernetwork.com
Because of the way Covid was and is being handled I want to raise the cigarette topic again to show us how how difficult changing a narrative is. Remember the narrative of the 1950s-60s, reinforced by the medical community, was that smoking was a cool and mildly rebellious way to be a sought after person. Just as doctors, researchers and medical journals could be “bought” then, they are perhaps even more vulnerable to that now, by “Big Pharma”. (That’s why Consumer Reports does not accept advertising- so they can remain objective in their reporting whereas your physician is subject to paid ads in his / her medical journals and in turn those journals are subject to manipulation because they rely on Big Pharma advertising to survive.
Why was Big Tobacco called “Big”? Because it had the power through its money to control The Narrative. That is accomplished through establishing non-profit “research” foundations and donations to politicians in vulnerable election areas.
Cigarettes were recognized as the cause of the epidemic in the 1940s and 1950s, with the confluence of studies from epidemiology, animal experiments, cellular pathology and chemical analytics. Cigarette manufacturers disputed this evidence, as part of an orchestrated conspiracy to salvage cigarette sales. Propagandizing the public proved successful, judging from secret tobacco industry measurements of the impact of denialist propaganda.
As late as 1960 only one-third of all US doctors believed that the case against cigarettes had been established.
history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll | Tobacco Control (bmj.com)
• During World War I, Army surgeons praised cigarettes for helping the wounded relax and easing their pain.
• In 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) as a “Group A” carcinogen, the most dangerous class of carcinogen.
• In April 1999, as part of the Master Settlement Agreement, the major U.S. tobacco companies agreed to remove all advertising from outdoor and transit billboards across the nation. The remaining time on at least 3,000 billboard leases, valued at $100 million, was turned over to the states for posting anti-tobacco messages. (2000 Surgeon General's Report Highlights: Tobacco Timeline | Smoking & Tobacco Use | CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2000/highlights/historical/index.htm
As I close this section let me ask one more question: Does it trouble you that 17,000 physicians and scientists have signed their name calling for an end to the Big Pharma created misinformation about Covid. Specifically, among other items like, no forced vaccinations for anyone-
The same methods Hitler used to consolidate his power after being elected with a minority of votes have been used against us with Covid. He had publishers print large splashy but false, inflammatory, and fear engendering articles about the “inferior” races to create a Narrative that supported his plans. (Recall the German people at that time were an intelligent and well educated populous) The almost invisible retraction of the false information was missed by the media. In exactly the same way the easy, hospital free and inexpensive management of the covid 19 virus was trashed in false research published by a prestigious medical journal under “criminal” levels of pressure, later to be retracted, but by then the door had been opened that unleashed the power of Big Pharma to engender fear and the resulting destruction we all experienced. see video #4 Covid- a concise report https://www.bitchute.com/video/A1ik2DOIdM9I/
August 31, 2023 update
The medical community now acknowledges that Ivermectin (IVM) was successfully curing the covid sick before Big Pharma threatened to crush physicians using it. In fact a handful of physicians knowing it was helping cure the sick and putting the needs of their patients first, kept using it and lost their licenses and careers. Nasty world out there! The chart below is part of the proof that it worked. It shows the skyrocketing Covid deaths in Peru after IVM was blocked.
One of the areas that defied Big Pharma to the benefit of their citizens, was a province in India called Uttar Pradesh. Compare it to the USA which is arguably controlled by Big Pharma: 4.3 Covid deaths per million people vs. 1596.3 deaths per million in the USA. Which country would you have said had better medical care-the USA or India? Which country should you have lived in during Covid? The province of Uttar Pradesh, India. (at least based on these numbers alone) Putting that in other words: For every one person who died in Uttar Pradesh, India of Covid, 371 died in the medically advanced USA: (1596.3 divided by 4.3=371)
… This IVM distribution occurred in Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in India, having a population of 229 million," the study added. There, widespread ivermectin distribution likely resulted in significantly lower COVID-19 deaths compared to areas not using the drug: "The cumulative total of COVID-19 deaths per million in population from July 7, 2021 through April 1, 2023 was 4.3 in Uttar Pradesh, as compared with 70.4 in all of India and 1,596.3 in the United States … The much lower number of COVID-19 deaths per population in all of India versus the United States in that period may reflect the use of these same home treatment kits containing IVM, doxycycline, and zinc in some other states of India."
SECTION 6- EVOLUTION? CREATION?
WHY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST MATTERS TODAY
I started this document talking about a pervasive sense that “things are broken”. I went on to explain in the subsequent sections in what ways, specifically, they are broken.
Its time to go to the source of the problem. Not only are surveys hearing people saying our systems are broken, we do live in a broken world. This is the issue, How did it get this way and what can we do, starting today- to fix it?
Thank you for walking with me as I revealed that our lack of ethics, lack of transparency and honestly permits philosophy to masquerade as science. The question is who / what is the ultimate arbiter of truth? In the past is has been The Bible and its emphasis on love, truth, forgiveness, sacrifice and servanthood. aka, The Golden Rule and the 10 commandments, which by the way are from Moses who is revered by not just the Jews and and Christians but also Muslims.
Let me summarize as I start the final Broken Wall of Truth in Science section.
If someone has only one foot on the dock as the boat slowly moves away from that dock, he knows things are moving toward a crisis. Similarly that is happening in our culture.
The foundations of what we have come to know, love, and enjoy were built on the acceptance of Biblical truth. You didn’t have to believe the Bible to benefit from a culture -government-education-health care built on its principles.
That is a broad and bold statement to some but accepted as fact by much or most of the older generation, say the typical Baby boomer and older. (Please read How Now Shall We Live/Colson,Pearcey) (Urban myth has some statement about how Christianity has caused our wars and killing. Dead wrong! The absence of God and the presence of the theory of evolution gave rise to the idea of purifying the white race as superior and justified the extermination of millions by one or another Marxists .)
Harvard, Princeton, and hundreds of others including my own alma matter The State University of New York at Buffalo, were founded on Biblical principles. It said so imbedded in the brickwork over the doorway of one of the original buildings when I was there 1972.
Would evolutionists believing in the “survival of the fittest” start a hospital? No. Let the sick die to weed out the unfit, weaker humans.
That perspective, now in control, will mean that today’s hospitals will not function on love but pragmatism. aka, If someone is sick, the response to the need will be to first determine how much of his/her life can contribute back to the government financially.
Would evolutionists want free education for all? No. There would/will be a careful selection of those who are the most likely to contribute financially to the government.
If this reminds you of one or another of the dystopian movies you have watched that’s because they are typically based on a loveless power in control doing everything to grow its power without regard to ethics. That’s my point.
Any resistance to that pragmatic approach is a remnant from the superseded Biblical idea of truth, love, and compassion. The boat leaving the dock in my analogy is the dystopian reality of a no-God-no love-no ultimate truth in society. That’s The Narrative.
The people feeling like things are broken are those with one foot on the dock of the Bible based society and one foot in today’s godless society and experiencing aspects of both the old and the new.
As the saying goes, “things don’t change overnight” so there are remnants of the old truth and love still at work in hospitals and government, even academia, but its due to what Glen Sunshine points out is a remnant of the Bible being supreme in our culture. i.e. even after the Bible has been de-throned as the ultimate arbiter of truth, the old ways carry on but with ever diminishing power and influence. https://faculty.wts.edu/posts/introduction-to-the-apologetic-of-cornelius-van-til/
(see video #1, Ethics)
So how does this topic of evolution relate to this section?
The incredible role the Bible had- past tense- as the ultimate arbiter of truth -the foundation of virtually all aspects of society- was based on it’s supremacy as God’s actual words to mankind. The God who created us also gave us a handbook just as an owner’s manual comes with a new car.
When the whitecoats of science said to the church, “the Bible is wrong, evolution is factually correct and proven”, the church said “ok”. Simple as that. No big confrontation with or amongst church leaders to sort it out. Just a full and complete trust of “science”
And so if the Bible is wrong it is not God’s word and therefore it has no basis for its role ABOVE the government and elected officials etc.
So seminary theologians started teaching evolution completely ignorant of the logic of what would be ahead for society, the church and Christianity, while teaching that the Bible is wrong.
“Everyone” in the church is shaken by year after year of statistics showing younger people leaving the church- in part because its foundation- The Bible and Jesus who wrote the Bible, is no longer trustworthy. Yes seminarians twist and skew, write books etc. to try to preserve the trustworthiness of the Bible while accepting evolution and the Big Bang but-
the younger generation see the charade because a 10 year old reading Genesis can see it. The child isn’t fooled. Only the adults. The Emperor’s clothes.
Main stream media, and textbooks used in high schools and colleges present the theory of evolution and the Big Bang Theory of the origin of the universe as accepted facts.
But in fact the actual scientists doing the research do NOT agree. Only the textbook writers make it sound like they do. Why? Because human nature loves the idea of NOT being accountable to God.
“The Narrative” wants us to be free from any remnant truth that might make us think our actions are accountable to a higher power than the government. So it promotes any broken down idea, even if it isn’t worthy of being called a scientific theory. Evolution and The Big Bang theory fit that category.
We want to be free to do whatever we can get away with because there is no higher power than the government to concern ourselves with and no higher truth to evaluate or constrain our desires. See video #1 Ethics: Doing The Right Thing, condensed. )
But that is still not enough for The Narrative. It wants to destroy our faith in the Bible and God and everything good accomplished through the work of Christians along with the biblical basics of living like the family unit.
This is so tragic because the Bible tells of a loving God that has an exciting personalized plan for each of our lives-
and can make something good out of our remaining years on earth no matter what the state or condition we might be in.
As an example, God found the skeptic, former White House staffer, Charles Colson on his way to serve a time in jail and used his condition to start a ministry (Prison Fellowship) to improve the lives of prisoners as well as start a Center for a Christian World View, The Colson Center.
The Bible, Jeremiah 29:11-12 For I know the plans I have for you,” says the Lord. “They are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope. In those days when you pray, I will listen.”
I remember hearing Charles Colson tell of Prison Fellowship ministry going into prisons and getting permission to run a section of a prison under Biblical precepts. When they did that there was measurably and observable more peace, many prisoners accepted the truth of scripture and started living for God and after serving their terms, they were far less likely to return. Thats a microcosm of a Bible based society.
If you take just one thing from this entire document please take this: In contrast to what The Narrative teaches us- that the Bible and God are vengeful kill-joys, the God of the Bible loves you, your friends, your community, in fact God loved the world so much he gave his only son Jesus to redeem us to be a part of his family. When the Bible’s laws form the basis of government laws, we have freedom and prosperity.
Conversely when The Narrative formulates laws we have tyranny. Utopian ideas always end in forceful implementation. And utopian ideas are the boat that is moving away from the dock, the boat our entire culture now seems to be on.
So now truth is established by “The Narrative” which is determined by those with the power. In the past, a witness took an oath on the Bible before testifying. Now the Bible is an option. The world of The Narrative is based on self love- “Looking out for #1”, “ truth” is in quotes because it entirely depends on the situation, and taking power and never giving it up. In video #1 Doing The Right Thing, condensed, we learn that “whoever has the power rules and there can be no appeal beyond power”. (More on this in the wrap up section below) https://www.bitchute.com/video/4hl50gtzsWMC/
But what if the Bible actually deserves its place above our government and above all our written laws? What if evolution and the Big bang theory are NOT actually settled science. What if there is more measurable observable evidence for the Bible’s account of creation indeed the Bible’s account of the last 6000 years of history, than there is for The Narrative’s account of the past?
As I was describing this new Substack post to a friend he guessed it would include Covid and Climate but Creation? As a bank forensics investigator he said “give me the short version” regarding creation. Fair request. So I gave him this:
F-R-A-U-D. No one can provide a reasonable sounding defense of evolutionary origins without including fraudulent examples. Empirical- measurable and observable science does NOT support The Narrative.
In contrast to what had been accepted as the Biblical account of a 6 day creation, a couple hundred years ago the idea spread in geology that the earth has always been as it is. As the power of observation became greater the thinking became billions of years not infinity. In either case, the assumptions point to a world that is barely changing. Does actual measurement support that barely changing philosophy? No.
Do we know how humans arrived on earth? How old is the earth and the universe? Present estimates we accept as science fact depend on assumptions from philosophy that CANNOT be tested.
I intentionally left this section #6 for the last because it will be the most radical of the points I have made. However, I could have made it first in that the subject is foundational to all our other topics. Why?
Here is the nub of it: If we evolved evolved from a lighting bolt hitting the swamp, we have the right to treat each other like slime and to throw away the Bible as the ultimate arbiter of truth and love. Conversely if the God of the Bible made us in his image as an act of love and a desire for companionship with us-
we are obliged to be respectful and loving of each other and acknowledge God and the Bible as the ultimate arbiter of truth.
I have been endeavoring to expose how “The Narrative” is typically just philosophy masquerading as science. This is destructive to empirical and observable science and as I have shown you, damages our health, wealth and in the case of the topic of creation vs. evolution, our faith.
(M)any … do not understand the stranglehold that philosophical naturalism has on geology and astronomy. The historical roots of philosophical naturalism reach back into the sixteenth century in the works of Galileo Galilei and Francis Bacon. … Two Enlightenment-generated philosophical movements in the eighteenth century, deism and atheism, elevated human reason to a place of supreme authority-
and took an anti-supernaturalistic view of the Bible, holding it to be just another human book.
The two movements, with their advocacy of an old-earth and their effect on astronomy and geology, preceded Darwin and supplied him with millions of years needed for his naturalistic theory of the origin of living things. From this lineage it is clear that geology is not an unbiased, objective science and that old-earth theories, naturalism and uniformitarianism are inseparable https://creation.com/philosophical-naturalism-and-the-age-of-the-earth-are-they-related
Once again we see that philosophy precedes and shapes science forcing it into a pre-determined mold I am calling “The Narrative”
Once again, what you and I hear and see about the age of the earth and our origins is philosophy masquerading as science.
Almost all the 100 or so methods of dating the age of the earth using observable and measurable science, support the accuracy of the Bible-
and its claim of a young earth and universe. https://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
Here is a quick summary of some. Then I will drill deeper.
• The rate of increasingly salinity of the oceans,
• the rate of crumbling of rock formations in the desert,
• the rapidly decaying magnetic fields our compasses rely on,
• that interplanetary space craft reveal planets and their moons that were assumed long “old and cold” are in fact still hot,
• the creation of brand new volcanic islands, stunning scientists as they quickly developed full spectrum for the region flora and fauna within years not millions of years. (Surtsey) https://creation.com/surtsey-the-young-island-that-looks-old
• Mount St Helens volcanic eruption that created sediment formations identical to the Grand Canyon in a few days- not the millions of years the Grand Canyon is reputed to have taken.
• And rocks from that 40 year old eruption date as a 2.8 million years old.
• The Big Bang Theory is not settled at all. Scientists continue to argue about it. Why? It never fit measurable observable science making it a philosophy masquerading as science. It depends on laws of science yet to be discovered and violates laws we do know.
• The original lighting bolt in the slime to start “Life”? Science gave up on that idea. The discovery of DNA proves design must come first. Darwin would never write his thesis today because the simple cell his era envisioned that would evolve into higher complexity life forms, inconveniently for the theory starts life “fully evolved” complete with complex molecular motors within each cell that have various tasks like taking out the garbage from its own cell.
• The Altenberg Conference, a gathering of the world’s leading evolutionists heard that “the theory of evolution which most biologists accept and which is taught in the classrooms today is inadequate in explaining our existence”… one attendee, evolutionist Dr. Jerry Fodor added, “I don’t think anybody knows how evolution works”. Jerry Bergamn summarizes, “The main mechanism for producing genetic variety required for evolution, random mutation has been falsified, as have all of the other mechanisms postulated to cause macro-evolution” . Evolution’s Blunders, Frauds and Forgeries, Bergman, pg. 29
• The famous creation on trial, “Scopes Monkey Trial”? The “primary evidence” is now known to be fraudulent but was part of the landscape then as well as now. Evolution’s Blunders, Frauds and Forgeries, Bergman, pg. 258
So the greatest disruptor of faith in the Bible, and by extension, society depending on the-
Bible’s rules (that come out of love) for the betterment of everyone was brought down by fraud.
Evolution cannot stand without fraud. When trusting Christians heard that the The White Coats of Science said that scripture, as understood for 3000 years was wrong, instead of suspending judgement, Christians and church leadership acquiesced. They said “ok we will trust science instead of God’s word but we will carry on proclaiming other aspects of God’s word as truth”. I know. I was one of them.
Lets get more detailed- a look at what is being observed and measured today.
Niagara Falls? Historically, the rate of erosion of the falls has been around 3 feet per year. During the last 12,300 years, it has eroded 11.4 kms. The Niagara Falls has retreated from Lake Ontario towards Lake Erie in the last 200 years at a yearly rate of 5 feet. However, since 1942, the rate of erosion has reduced. Due to remedial efforts, the current erosion rate has come down to about 1 foot per year. Rate of Erosion of Niagara Falls (niagarafallshotels.com) 5 feet per year is a race horse in geological terms.
Mount Everest? The continent India sits on is moving 50 mm per year and Mount Everest is still growing taller at the rate of 4 mm per year. We read: Arching over 8,849 metres (29,032ft) into the sky, Everest is the world’s tallest mountain. Once, the craggy limestone peaks that skim the sky of Everest, were on the ocean floor. Scientists believe it all began to change about 200 million years ago – at around the time the Jurassic dinosaurs were beginning to emerge – when the supercontinent of Pangea cracked into pieces. The Indian continent eventually broke free, journeying north across the vast swathe of Tethys Ocean for 150 million years until it smacked into a fellow continent – the one we now know as Asia – around 45 million years ago… And so the Himalayan mountain range began to rise skyward. By around 15-17 million years ago, the summit of Everest had reached about 5,000m (16,404ft) and it continued to grow. The collision between the two continental plates is still happening today. India continues to creep north by 5cm (2in) a year, causing Everest to grow by about 4mm (0.16in) per year (although other parts of the Himalayas are rising at around 10mm per year [0.4in]).How tall will Mount Everest get before it stops growing? - BBC Future
Now if you are like me, your mind glazes over with all these millions of years and so no one does the math. But lets have some fun and do it. 17 million years ago Everest was 5000 meters and has been growing at 4 mm per year since. 17 million x 4 mm per year=68000000 divided by 1000 = 68,000 meters increase growth in height plus the 5000 it was 15 million years ago, for today’s projected height of Mount Everest using their own numbers is 73,000 meters tall.
That means aircraft would have to avoid crashing into Mount Everest today as their normal elevations is about 10,000 meters.
Lets compare that projected height to the Bible’s timeline. There is actually some parallels in this article to what the Bible says and what is understood by geologists who look at the Bible as factual. The BBC report suggests there was an initial period of faster rising of Everest (around 45 million years ago ) followed by today’s slower rising. (around 15-17 million years ago) These geologists in carefully examining the observable, measurable science and comparing it to scripture also believe there was an initial fast rising. But these scientists believe it took place over the few months of the global flood (AKA Noah and The Ark) This happened about 6000 years ago. Yes I appreciate that is a radical thought for all us who grew up with millions and billions of year embedded in our minds. But anyone monitoring earthquakes and volcanoes knows a few months of non stop such activity on a global scale can accomplish these cataclysmic events.
So lets review the measurable and observable to see which matches today’s reality more closely? If we take the Bible’s number of about 6000 years ago for the formation of Mount Everest and its height after some tectonic plate activity of the 5000 meter height, then add 6000 years at 4 mm per year for 24 more meters, we get a projected Everest today of 5024 meters. So, which is closer to the actual present 8849 meters? The 73,000 meters from the “BBC Future” or 5060 meters using the Bible’s timeline?
Evolution says Mount Everest should be 73,000 meters tall. The fact that it measures 8,849 meters should tell you something about the reliability of evolution.
So while “The Narrative” teaches canyons like the Grand Canyon take millions of years to form, (The story begins almost two billion years ago with the formation of the igneous and metamorphic rocks of the inner gorge https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/nature/grca-geology.htm) we have now observed in real time and measured (observable and measurable) that canyon creating can happen in days.
Mount St. Helen eruption
Mount St Helen “crashed the party” of the billions of years geologists. It’s eruption showed in real time that geological dating cannot be trusted. No one was here “2 billion years ago” to start the clock. But we were here when Mount St. Helens erupted. Scientists knew it was coming and had endeavored to clear the area. Despite that 57 people were killed by its explosion and landslide May 18, 1980.
Two scientists, 10 years after the eruption, took their rock hammers to extract a rock. Then they broke it up and sent the smaller pieces to a lab for dating.
courtesy Creation Ministries
Table 1. Potassium-argon ‘ages’ for whole rock and mineral concentrate samples from the lava dome at Mount St. Helens
If such dating is reliable the lab report should have come back stating the rocks were “10 years old” but instead they came back dated at up to 2.8 million years old. Creation Ministries writes “It is clear that radioisotope dating is not the ‘gold standard’ of dating methods, or ‘proof’ for millions of years of Earth history. When the method is tested on rocks of known age, it fails miserably. The lava dome at Mount St Helens is not a million years old! At the time of the test, it was only about 10 years old. In this case we were there—we know! How then can we accept radiometric-dating results on rocks of unknown age? This challenges those who promote the faith of radioisotope dating, especially when it contradicts the clear eyewitness chronology of the Word of God. Radio-dating in Rubble (creation.com)
And the strata in the Grand Canyon that took many millions of years to form? It was created after Mount St Helens in hours. How can strata take millions of year when upright upright trees are found penetrating “millions of years” of strata? https://creation.com/sedimentation-experiments-nature-finally-catches-up/
The theory of the big bang is foundational to the idea that there is no God. So no matter how decrepit the theory is, it is given legs to run and a loud voice to shout by the Mainstream Media.
Is there any truth to it? Basically no. It has no right to even be called a theory because from day one scientists knew it could not be true because it violates some basic known and accepted laws of physics and depends on yet to be discovered laws of science. So scientists continue to argue about it. Let’s take a look.
DID THE BIG BANG REALLY HAPPEN? SCIENTIST DISPUTES UNIVERSE'S ORIGIN STORY
Is it time to let go of the Big Bang hypothesis?
The Big Bang is so widely accepted as the origin story of the universe that most people forget it is still a theory, and not proven fact. But new research led by astronomer Eric Lerner disputes the Big Bang, claiming that recent observations of light elements in the universe contradict the assumptions that support the theory....Lerner is a long-time critic of the Big Bang theory. In 1991, he wrote a book titled, The Big Bang Never Happened, in which he criticizes the popular theory and suggests a model of an infinitely old universe instead….Lerner’s alternative is just one of many models to rival the Big Bang, but none have quite caught on. For example, the Steady State Universe hypothesis suggests that matter is still being created in the universe and that it is therefore infinite with no beginning nor end, while the Black Hole theory suggests that the universe originated from a black hole and that there are different universes in every black hole. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientist disputes universe's origin story (inverse.com)
Is the mainstream media really helping science?.
For example, if the National Geographic really wanted to be true to science and helpful to humanity they would run a whole series of articles about the amazing book called the Bible. No book comes close to it. Beyond debate, it is a few thousand years old with many fragments going back a thousand years.
Comparing those old fragments with the current text affirms that The Bible has been carefully copied by scribes, generation after generation, without any error that changes anything of substance.
The National Geographic loves talking about the hidden aspects of the oceans. It could report that God first spoke of springs in the ocean about 3600 BCE. It took scientists to 1973 to actually observe them for the first time.
The Bible records God speaking to Job, asking him 16“Have you explored the springs from which the seas come? Have you explored their depths? https://biblehub.com/job/38-16.htm (Creation Magazine, vol 45, #2, 2023, pg 19, Dr. Sarah Buckland)
The National Geographic loves reporting on archaeology. It could reveal that the Bible’s predictions of the future thousands of years before the events occurred.
One was the coming of Jesus. The Bible named the town he would be born in, the different town he would be raised in and a description of how he would be crucified before that method had been invented. As well, the Bible predicted that Israel would be given land to regroup as a nation a few thousand years before it happened in 1948. A staggering prediction. An amazing event. An incredible book.
But no mainstream magazine seems brave enough to run that much truth in opposition to The Narrative.
I promised in the “Climate Section” a look into how far prestigious media organizations like The National Geographic will go to support The Narrative. You may also recall from earlier that one of the tricks of propaganda is to intentionally report false “news” that supports your agenda planning to retract it if you get caught. So you correctly ask, “what’s the point of doing that?” Because the original false but multi-page story replete with photos and illustrations is picked up as truth, by other media supporting The Narrative, then spread rapidly around the world. Conversely, the “retraction” is a tiny paragraph that gets buried in a subsequent issue and and is ignored by the media.
Evolution? The National Geographic was warned well in advance of publication to pull a story about the holy grail of evolution, finding a “missing link”-
If something is true than science doesn’t need to resort to fraud. That is an example of philosophy masquerading as science.
Let me wind this down with a look at the science of DNA. Darwin envisioned a simple cell somehow “evolving” into something more and more complex that eventually led to humankind. (The so-called evidence presented to support this has either shown to be fraudulent, or a case of adaptation, not evolution https://creation.com/3-rs-of-evolution )
The discovery of DNA was the first massive knock out punch to that idea -evolution-
because it demonstrated that the plan- the blueprint-for each cell comes in advance of the growth of the cell. The cell cannot function without it. The so-called simple cell is not. It functions with tiny mitochondrial engines that have tasks like taking out the garbage.
courtesy Creation Ministries
Life depends on an incredible enzyme called ATP synthase, the world’s tiniest rotary motor. This tiny protein complex makes an energy-rich compound, ATP (adenosine triphosphate). Each of the human body’s 14 trillion cells performs this reaction about a million times per minute. Over half a body weight of ATP is made and consumed every day! . https://creation.com/atp-synthase
The 2nd knockout punch was the discovery that our DNA is degenerating each generation.
Instead of humans and life forms evolving- get higher and better each generation- we are- devolving -getting worse. Parents pass on to their children 50 to 100 mutations each generation.
If you remember photocopying a photocopy of some text, imagine keeping repeating that process. Each photocopy adds a black spec here or there and the letters slowly degrade. At some generation of copy, the black specs have occurred over enough broken letters that the meaning of the original text can no longer be read.
In the same way, researchers used this generational degradation to go backwards and-
suggest that everyone on earth came from a common single woman. Yes, really. They even salute the Bible calling her ‘Mitochondrial Eve’
The review in Science’s ‘Research News’ goes still further about Eve’s date, saying that ‘using the new clock, she would be a mere 6000 years old.’ https://creation.com/a-shrinking-date-for-eve
The researchers are not admitting that the Bible’s Eve, is the DNA Eve, just that the particular race called the human race all came from one woman and she may have lived as recently as 6000 years ago, consistent with the Bible’s timeline. (They surmise that other races that evolved went extinct.)
Let me take you back 50 years to an Evolution vs. Creation debate at my high school. As it turned out, there was no debate. The Christian medical doctor called in to defend creation agreed with the evolutionist biology teacher: We were told that even as we develop in the womb, we have gills for a phase. So I accepted that.
Turns out that evolution in the womb illustrations were known to be fraudulent 50 before my non-debate.
A grid of shark, snake, chick and human embryos, modelled on Haeckel’s but more accurate and much less successful (from Richard Hesse, Abstammungslehre und Darwinismus (1902), 21).
Specifically, (from the back cover of Evolution’s blunders, Frauds and Forgeries), For instance, diagrams of developing embryos, from a supposedly expert academic-
were so useful in persuading people that evolution was unquestionably true that their exposure as fraudulent was ignored.
It took over 100 years for this fraud to be re-exposed, and textbook publishers have still been very reluctant to drop it.(at Amazon)
A 2nd book details this known but ignored for 100 years fraud. It was just too useful a tool for The Narrative to let the old fashioned concept of truth and honestly get in the way. Its a perfect example of how The Narrative”, not truth is what is important: A new book tells, for the first time in full, the extraordinary story of drawings of embryos initially published in 1868. The artist was accused of fraud – but, copied and recopied, his images gained iconic status as evidence of evolution.https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/features/haeckels-embryos-the-images-that-would-not-go-away (For more information on this specific fraud you can read more here: https://creation.com/haeckel-fraud-proven and https://creation.com/haeckel-fraud-proven-part-2
All in all, I have just given you a sampling of the dating methods that challenge the millions and billions of years. Almost all 100 or so methods point to a young earth and universe and the few that suggest old can be challenged with measurable observable science. https://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
(Although I would like you to read the final couple pages of this section, if the theology of this doesn’t matter to you skip on to the final section, SECTION 7- BROADENING YOUR INFORMATION SOURCES TO REBUILD THE WALL, you won’t miss any science)
Why believing in Christ and evolution is irrational. You must choose which you will follow
After my high school non-debate- I carried on believing evolution but also trusting the Bible. I was shown decades later how that was irrational. Richard Dawkins calls my thinking “barking mad”
In the past, major decisions that impacted the Christian faith would include a gathering of church leaders to resolve issues. In contrast this issue slithered silently into the church like a snake, and it was easily accepted because it let a Christian reconcile The Scientist in His White Coat with the Bible. Science never lies right? I know. I accepted it. It made sense. Except that the substance is fraudulent. But I didn’t know that.
Let me explain. I am simply laying out why I was being irrational to carry on believing the Bible while holding evolution to be true. This will also help readers who may not know the Bible’s account of Adam and Eve and why it’s foundational to the Christian faith.
Accepting that humans evolved means that the Bible is just plain in error: Evolution is a substitute for God.
Evolution says it/time, not God, created us. But the Bible Genesis, old testament, clearly states that Adam and Eve were actual people created by God and that Adam’s sin got them thrown out of the garden.
Just to make sure we accepted that this is real, not myth, the Bible gives us a timeline with a complete genealogy from Christ back to Adam plus the age of many of his ancestors when they died.
This facilitates a creation timeline of about 6500 years ago plus or minus a few hundred years.
Genesis 2 15The LORD God placed the man in the Garden of Eden to tend and watch over it. 16But the LORD God warned him, “You may freely eat the fruit of every tree in the garden— 17except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If you eat its fruit, you are sure to die.”,
Genesis 3: The Man and Woman Sin, 1The serpent was the shrewdest of all the wild animals the LORD God had made. One day he asked the woman, “Did God really say you must not eat the fruit from any of the trees in the garden?” 2“Of course we may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,” the woman replied. 3“It’s only the fruit from the tree in the middle of the garden that we are not allowed to eat. God said, ‘You must not eat it or even touch it; if you do, you will die.’”
4“You won’t die!” the serpent replied to the woman. 5“God knows that your eyes will be opened as soon as you eat it, and you will be like God, knowing both good and evil.” 6The woman was convinced. She saw that the tree was beautiful and its fruit looked delicious, and she wanted the wisdom it would give her. So she took some of the fruit and ate it. Then she gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it, too. 7At that moment their eyes were opened, and they suddenly felt shame at their nakedness. So they sewed fig leaves together to cover themselves. ( genesis 3. )
As if that is not enough detail to anchor that the Bible wants us to see Adam as the first and real human we are given the reason Christ had to die explained in the the New Testament. It also connects back to Adam.
Adam and Christ Contrasted
12When Adam sinned, sin entered the world. Adam’s sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned. 13Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. But it was not counted as sin because there was not yet any law to break. 14Still, everyone died—from the time of Adam to the time of Moses—even those who did not disobey an explicit commandment of God, as Adam did. Now Adam is a symbol, a representation of Christ, who was yet to come. 15But there is a great difference between Adam’s sin and God’s gracious gift. For the sin of this one man, Adam, brought death to many. But even greater is God’s wonderful grace and his gift of forgiveness to many through this other man, Jesus Christ. 16And the result of God’s gracious gift is very different from the result of that one man’s sin. For Adam’s sin led to condemnation, but God’s free gift leads to our being made right with God, even though we are guilty of many sins. 17For the sin of this one man, Adam, caused death to rule over many. But even greater is God’s wonderful grace and his gift of righteousness, for all who receive it will live in triumph over sin and death through this one man, Jesus Christ. Romans 5, NLT version https://biblehub.com/romans/5-12.htm
Note that the name Adam or the pronoun for him is used 19 times in these sections.
Christ dies specifically to atone-”pay the fine or penalty” to use a legal term, for Adam’s original sin.
Notice also that the word we hate, “sin”, is used, I count, 13 times. What is “sin”? I believe the Bible supports this short definition: “Anything done or not done that is a failure to love”. Jesus expands that to even a thought you harbor that is unloving. God doesn’t just do love, the Bible says God is love, (1 John 4:16 https://biblehub.com/nlt/1_john/4.htm)
Also notice the 3rd party in the Garden of Eden narrative. The Serpent. This passage starts the narrative about Satan with that verse and ends it at the end of the Bible and the end of time, Revelation. But in between those times, notice that Satan- the serpent reveals his “modus operandi”, twists and skews God’s specific commands and inflames desire for the wrong things. (Maybe re-read Genesis 3:1 to 6 above to see Satan in action) I just checked my spelling on that Latin phrase “modus operandi” and noticed its criminal roots. Very appropriate for a Being and his associates the Bible describes as incapable of truth and always lying and deceiving) https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/modus_operandi and This great dragon—the ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, the one deceiving the whole world—was thrown down to the earth with all his angels. https://biblehub.com/nlt/revelation/12.htm.
So how was I irrational in believing in a symbolic Adam while continuing to be a Christian? Atheist Richard Dawkins says this: “So Jesus had himself tortured and executed for a symbolic sin by a non-existent individual?”
He refers to those of us who claim to believe in evolution along with Bible and Christ as “barking mad”.
So if you insist of believing in evolution then the central and single point of The Good News-Jesus death on the cross for us-was completely irrational. Christianity is pointless. That thinking is no better than the Apostle Paul’s thinking beliefs while he was still “Saul”. (before his Damascus road conversion to faith in Jesus.)
Fortunately, when you take off the mask of philosophy masquerading as science, there is no problem accepting the Biblical account of creation as clearly written and easily understood by a 10 year old.
We can be fully justified in putting the Bible back in its place above government AND science as the completely reliable final arbiter of truth and love. Doing that is the only way to heal the brokenness in our society.
Inviting the Jesus of the Bible to be central in your heart, along with his words- the Bible- will restore the brokenness in your life.
SECTION 7- BROADENING YOUR INFORMATION SOURCES TO REBUILD THE WALL
And, what is the WEF, (The World Economic Forum) and why does it matter
WRAP UP
The fundamental question for those privileged enough to have a full stomach and the time to ponder is, “How do we solve our problems and create a new utopian world? How do we address the world’s inequities? The poverty? The wars? Climate change? Suicide and substance abuse? Declining health services? The right to chose to destroy the baby within?”
Do we go against history and accept The Narrative that there is a new way?
When we honestly and transparently review history we see that nothing but the Bible’s principles can form the basis of a free, functioning and prosperous society without the use of force. Not because it is a religious book and we need religion but because it is written by the Creator of us. He knows what brings out the best of us and the laws of the universe including the laws of civilization because He established those laws and revealed them to us in the Bible. (see more in video #1, Loss of Ethics, How did we get into this mess and video #3, “The Importance and Validity of Reading Genesis as History”)
Dr. Martin Lloyd Jones said, “There can be no doubt whatsoever that all the troubles in the Church today and most of the troubles in the world, are due to a departure from the authority of the Bible” (video #3, “The Importance and Validity of Reading Genesis as History”)
Martin Lloyd jones trust
But once again the idea that there is a utopian alternative has grown in power and promoted by The Narrative. Alternatives have proven bankrupt although attempted by Stalin, Hitler, Mao… They all fail to create that utopia because they don’t recognize the human nature God gave us.
There have always been the creative philosophers amongst us who write about new ways to create a solution- a utopian solution. For example Karl Marx. What’s not to like with the idea of the workers sharing equally instead of the rich getting richer.
The Narrative has a solution to each of these problems. It is claimed to rest on science but I am saying in this report that it rests on philosophy masquerading as science.
I turned on this video “Dutch Farmers…” at lunch break to watch for a few minutes today and didn’t want to stop it as it explains why, using false science, the Canadian Government and the Netherlands are forcing lower food production. This video also talks about what seems unrelated until it takes us deeper into to why the American / Mexican border and that of other Western nations appear wide open to illegal migrants. Both actions are meant to de-stabilize the western nations facilitating uncontested government control by a fearful population.
If it was only a theory of what the governments might do it would be unbelievable but because they are actually doing it, we cannot pretend we don’t have a serious problem.
Why else would governments be doing what otherwise makes no sense, i.e. shutting down farming in The Netherlands without first lining up alternative and reliable food sources.
The problem is no alternative solutions than those set out in the Bible ever work. Tyrannical governments with power to kill are always necessary to bring the euphoric ideas into existence. Think Hitler. Castro. Stalin. Mao Zedong (China) Did the “masses” benefit from these regimes or did the new tyrannies end of benefiting the elites?
So here we are- society already embarking on a new utopia- a “new” solution to the world’s problems.
This time the world’s largest corporations are going to work hand in hand with the various branches of the United Nations. Disease will be eradicated through mandatory regular vaccinations. Climate change will be stopped through abandoning our carbon creating autos, BBQs, power boats, single family homes, etc. The plan is that they are to be abandoned to litter the landscape like a strewn mess of weaponry after a battle.
To hasten the demise, the largest investment funds are already penalizing corporations who insist on hiring based on merit alone for the benefit of the company’s financial health along withs its employees and shareholders. (ESG)
If you are supportive of this new idea of Big Business working hand in hand with the UN and the Davos Man, the good news for you is that you don’t have to do anything. Its rolling out as you read this.
However, if you aren’t so sure and want to learn more may I encourage you to stop reading, watching and listening to the main stream media, (MSM) as your first source of news, at least until you have fully briefed yourself from another perspective. Start listening to the alternatives. The MSM have to protect their advertising revenue, and in Canada, handouts from the government, literally through the tax department if they support “The Narrative”.
You may notice that you are not watching the video on the WEF website. It was taken down after complaints without, to my knowledge, the WEF disavowing their ownership.
I expect that someone reminded them of a foundational propaganda principle- you can’t present an idea initially that is too shockingly different than the hearer is willing to accept.
You have probably heard of the parable of the frog happy to paddle in the ever so slowly increasing temperature of the pot of water. Too late does it realize it has a problem. Key: Slowly introduce radical ideas.
When you watch the video look for the phrase “Western Values” I understand we are to read that as the elimination of Christian values. You would think tyrannical governments would endorse the Christian mandates of being supportive of the government, paying your taxes and being honest, kind and generous. But no. They refuse to sublimate their power to any other God.
So the world will be a better place as we eliminate the command to “Love your neighbors as yourself”? That’s a lovely sentiment so that will likely stay.
No- what the WEF wants to eliminate is this commandment of the 10:
15 “You shall not steal.
17 “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”
And the prelude to the 10 commandments and the first one:
Vs 1 “And God spoke all these words: 2 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 3 “You shall have no other gods before[a] me. Exodus 20,
New International Version https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+20&version=NLT
Why those commandments in particular? God is clearly saying two things that are unacceptable to all tyrants: First- Jehovah God is our ultimate protector and provider. All governments are under His authority, and two, “do not steal or covet” enshrines property rights. Another anathema to tyranny.
So how will we solve the world’s problem?
Think about a village that lived by the 10 commandments. There would be no/minimal need for police, lawyers, jails, children’s aid societies, 3 and 4 layers of government. That is how God envisioned the Hebrew nation living in their new homeland. It was based on self-governance. Not the force of police. Not even a king. Only the equivalent to what we call today pastors or clergy. Indeed, my American friends tell me that self governance is the bedrock of the American Constitution which was crafted from the wisdom found in the Bible.
But the Bible is unacceptable in government today.
Don’t allow the horrific phrase “white religious nationalism” to confuse the issue: The two key words are theocracy and freedom.
Theocracy is saying that the laws of man and government are under God and the Bible. Never in history has putting Jehovah God below government brought freedom.
What will make it different this time?
History doesn’t allow us to think that secularism- not believing in any god is somehow neutral and safe and leads to a fair and just for all, egalitarian society, free, and free from abuse. As society leaves behind the Bible-scripture as the ultimate arbiter of truth, government decides truth always in favor of its own selfish initiatives.
In fact the change being called for has already been occurring. The 2011 video series, Doing The Right Thing is a review of the collapse of ethics that led to the 2008 financial meltdown (the consequences of which are still being felt). The series points out that at that time society was living on the fumes of its prior trust in the Bible and warned of worse to come. Indeed, worse has come.
“…whoever has the power rules and there can be no appeal beyond power”. Dr. Robert George, Professor Jurisprudence, Princeton University, Video # 1 Doing the Right Thing
“Justice becomes whoever has the power to enforce and that becomes very dangerous”. Michael Matheson Miller, Chief of Strategic Initiatives at the Acton Institute. Video # 1 Doing the Right Thing video
This is the fruit of a post Bible/Christian era. Prior, the pursuit of truth was the common denominator. Now power is what establishes truth. This is explained in Video #1 of the 7 video series free for you to watch.
So in the absence of Biblical ethics why do we read the newspaper or equivalent trusting it as if Jesus was the editor in chief? Why are we so easily misled by the mainstream media as it boastfully declares “beware the alternative media”.
Why have we given up trusting the amazing Bible, filled with hundreds of prophesies that validate its authenticity as the owners manual of the one who created us.
The bible is filled with practical advice like diversifying investments “7 or 8 ways” to avoid catastrophic loss. How do organizations like life insurance companies which must pay out whether the market is high or low, decade after decade? By following that advice. I know: I counted the number on a pie chart shown to me in investment seminars by numerous insurance companies. Divide your portion among seven, or even eight, for you do not know what disaster may befall the land. Ecclesiastes 11:2 https://biblehub.com/amp/ecclesiastes/11.htm
If the church doesn’t believe the Bible why should anyone else? Imagine yourself leaving the car dealership with your brand new auto. The sales advisor calls after you, “In the glove box is the owner’s manual with oil change instructions and the like, save yourself some money and ignore it, its not true” Would you stick to the mandated oil changes and maintenance routines?
Where do I suggest you start to fine alternatives to the Mainstream media? These are ones I read. I cannot state that I know all of what they may have agenda wise but can state they appear to be endeavoring to be honest and transparent (I declare I have no remuneration links with these organizations. )
(BTW, if you “fact check” these sources you will probably find them “discredited”. That is exactly the point. People with my credentials, a BA in Speech Communication have been paid to discredit professors like Dr. Byram W. Bridle and given the microphone to do so-- Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph--BSc in Biomedical Sciences (University of Guelph); MSc and PhD in Immunology (University of Guelph)--Dr. Bridle received his post-doctoral training in viral immunology at McMaster University. As a professor at the University of Guelph, his research program focuses on the development of vaccines against infectious diseases, engineering immunotherapies for cancers, and studying host immune responses against viruses. Yet his objections to the safety and efficacy of the Covid vaccinations caused him to be prohibited from his professorship at his University of Guelph campus. https://substack.com/search/bridle
Canadian Alternative News sources I have found trustworthy
In no particular order other than to say LifeSiteNews was the first I believe to expose the Mainstream media failure to cover alternative Covid research.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ There is a Canada and Catholic version.
Liberty Coalition Canada, https://libertycoalitioncanada.com/ which includes Open Mike with Michael Thiessen, also available on apps such as Fight laugh feast network, a free google app
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance. If you want to hear the other side of the story- the one the government doesn’t want you to know or if you have a Covid vax injury they have a section https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/about-us/
Helpful podcasts and videos from the Colson Center Breakpoint commentaries, https://breakpoint.org/ https://www.colsoncenter.org/
RAIR Foundation https://rairfoundation.com/
The Christian Post, https://www.christianpost.com/
The Western Journal, https://www.westernjournal.com/
Breitbart, https://www.breitbart.com/
National File. https://nationalfile.com/
Web Browsers: Mojeek Browser to get research unfiltered by Google, https://www.mojeek.com/ “Mojeek’s web search results are 100% independent. They come from our crawler (MojeekBot) and index of the web, and are ordered using our own ranking algorithms.” In contrast Google and the others who use their algorithms are intentionally suppressing conservative thinking and skewing search results. Robert Epstein discovered this and has had the courage to speak out.
About the accompanying video Series which pre-dated this document:
The videos came first and do not explore everything this document does. However they present the experts and so have authority.
To present them in an orderly way I have created channels, with 7 videos, yes all free. They explain how we got into this mess and lead you through the different sectors of science-based truth that have been manipulated to diminish our lives. (They are number 1-7 with an introductory video. (Unfortunately, they do not appear in order on the rumble channel home page.)
They are in order at Bitchute but that platform reduces the image quality somewhat (as a video producer I notice). Bitchute
Take your choice.
I call the series “The Broken Wall, Nehemiah, & The Lion”. I see evidence, no, I think you will agree if you have read to here that we can call it proof -proof that the wall dividing empirical- measurable observable truth in science is broken. This means that philosophy masquerading as science is being used to destroy lives, jobs, even our faith.
The methods used to repress abortion risks opened my eyes to look for the same strategies being used in other areas of science. If the health of women and children was being consistently thrown under the bus for political gain in one area why not another area? So as I explored I discovered there is the truthful and beneficial narrative in opposition to the destructive one we call The Narrative.
Because truth delivered with love is always better for mankind.
I am hoping you will take the time to explore them. If my observations are correct, you will appreciate the “heads up” on the persuasive, pervasive, ubiquitous and destructive forces at work around you.
Finally, my analogy of the change of rules 1/2 time at a football game is a weak one. This is no game. There is evil. It plays for keeps.
B. Keith Neely
Colson Fellow, (Colson Center for Christian World view)
(This post is my own and not endorsed by any organization)
