Darwin said to kill his theory if this occurred: It did in 1996. So why is it still being promoted as truth and useful for scientific discovery?
Beware the hidden purpose of Evolution: #3 in my series revealing how creation lies are utilized by tyrants to overpower and enslave us
Darwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”
What type of biological system could not be formed by “numerous successive slight modifications”? Well, for starters, a system that is irreducibly complex. By irreducibly complex I mean a single system which is composed of several interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning.12 irreducibly
#3 in my series of 9 posts about creation, scroll to end for the list
Almost 30 years ago a list of 40 tiny molecular cellular machines that meet Darwin’s criteria to withdraw his theory were presented to the scientific community through the book Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution by Michael Behe. Darwins-Black-Box
(Scroll down for the full list)
Each machine alone destroys the idea of evolution. They could not have evolved. These incredible machines work inside each cell. They turn functions on and off. They take out the garbage. They carefully organize and monitor the reproduction of each cell to minimize mutations.
The classic mouse trap is such an item.
No part of it can be removed and it still function. Unlike, say your car. If the windshield wipers don’t work the car can still function. But no part of a mousetrap can be removed.
What is the point? Darwin’s premise was that as random events slowly added to design, something more primitive became more complex over ions of random changes- while the basic life form continued to function.
But the mousetrap cannot function with any piece missing. The fancy phrase used by scientists and engineers is “irreducible complexity”. So how could it (the biological equivalent of the mouse trap) have started?
As of 1996 there were 40 incredibly tiny, biological molecular machines such as the mousetrap (only infinitely more amazing) discovered.
The significance to these machines is that they cannot function if any single part of the them is removed. Such a machine cannot evolve part by part. It does not work at all until all the parts are in place.
Think about what we accept when we buy into evolution. It is like re-assembling a broken lawnmower taken apart by an eager teenager but left to rust. Or an abandoned aircraft with parts strewn around.
Evolution preaches that somehow, in contravention to the law of entropy-
that says that things move towards disorder, (like my office or bedroom gets messy) those parts will find their way back together, over time, and the lawn mower or airplane will restart itself. (Entropy: The Invisible Force That Brings Disorder to the Universe entropy )
Please think about what I am saying. That is the insanity of what we have been taught.
Even though the laws of nature say it cannot happen, we are taught that it can and does, over time.
The scientific need for creator God is replaced by time
Why do scientists fight against their own laws of science? Why do those outside science promote junk science? (I will get to that in a moment)
Getting back to the molecular machines in biology which could not have evolved because they will not work without every single part of them intact, I have animations for two of the items on that list.
Number 8 and 11 have animations shown here:
So why does the useless idea of evolution, that should have been discarded with the discovery of DNA, (if not sooner,) and then absolutely discarded in accordance with Darwin’s own instructions with the discovery of the 40 (and growing) list of irreducibly complex machines, carry on?
The belief in evolution was/is the justification of totalitarianism, Nazism and other present day tyrannies and medical experimentation. Because we “evolved” the “successful” among us can claim to be superior to others to justify abuses and create an elite group of superior people.
The Rockefeller book (“Rockefeller-Controlling-Game”) speaks of this on page 14, 25,27,29,88 as well as many other places. Why?
The masses apparently aren’t competent to run their lives or their country
(pg. 288). The elites are working towards a super person- “God-like” to run things. (pg.304) The elites are not only “justified” in taking charge they are “obligated” to do so.
Thousands of NGOs- Non governmental organizations, supported by elite money, not the grass roots money they present themselves as being supported by, work against our rights, freedoms and comforts in life, like air conditioning* and driving a car beyond the “15 minute city”. These NGOs work to undermine the benefit of men and women thinking and creating.
They make the regular people the problem rather than the solution to our problems.
This philosophy justifies all the destructive acts we have been subjected to such as the narrative, “By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy”. All of this comes from the philosophy of evolution which removes Creator God and his ownership of what he creates. It removes the rights and freedoms he bestows. It leaves the world open for their control and crushing laws.
* Today I will add heat as well. As I write this millions across North America, including me, are covered by frigid artic air. A number on a thermometer does not adequately communicate how we would be suffering without ample carbon based heating. My 20 minute walk today in the full sun was cut short by skin freezing in mere minutes. But my wife enjoyed exercising in an indoor heated pool. How? Through massive amounts of carbon being used. Fortunately science has always shown carbon to be a benefit. There is no “dose effect” of double the atmospheric carbon meaning double the heat trap and double the global warming. mathemagic
The temperature dropping over the past 1000 years approximately, (and consequential glacial advancement) ending 1850, had to occur or we would now be locked in an ice age. Temperatures, levels of carbon and sea levels have been higher and lower in the past as a perfectly operating earth maintains a temperature we can function in.
So while there has been a tiny bit of warming, it is a fraction of the amount the fraudulent and fearmongering hockey stick graph promised. climate-hockey-sticks That’s a different subject, but for now, but if you are in the frigid temps enjoy staying warm. hurting-our-children-4-ways
Importantly to “left wing” initiatives,
evolution also supports the gender confusion and transhumanism.
Whereas “creation” as in God created “male and female”, does not.
As well, abortion is based on evolution. We don’t have the right to participate in the destroying of God’s property -ending a life- without a fair trial and a jury agreeing to the death sentence of the individual. A study of the pro-choice initiatives reveals that there is no argument against the preborn baby being fully human. The baby as a “blob- just tissue” aspect is only in the non written promotion, not on the abortion provider websites that I have seen. The 1972 Roe v. Wade was based on a skewing of the constitutional right to protect your property, “privacy”. No one argued to the judges that the baby was not fully human because they would have lost. Nothing happens as the baby comes down the birth canal that transform him or her from “just tissue” to human. That is merely a legal slight of hand.
Remember, God created you so he could share his love with you as you chose to join his family. He gave us the intelligence to explore the world he created and freedom to chose to accept or reject the evidence of intelligent design- his design.
However, as we resist the evidence of creation, we support tyranny.
To learn more about the evolution and biology aspects may I recommend browsing these two sources:
https://creation.com/en-ca/articles/origin-of-life
https://evolutionnews.org/2013/06/did_scientists_/
https://www.discovery.org/a/2128/ Specific to the book, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemistry of the Cell which presented this problem to Darwin’s idea in 1996
Coming up in my series of 9 posts about creation:
The Bible and science do NOT conflict. The apparent conflict is between the Bible and ideas some, not all, scientists hold.
POSTED-Dinosaurs, 1446 Corvette
POSTED-Science- empirical- reveals we are devolving, not evolving- DNA. Each generation compounding DNA errors pointing back to our common origins with “Mitochondrial Eve” between 6000 and 100,000 years ago crush-globalists-1-lie-
POST PENDING- THIS ONE—Darwin would never suggest evolution today. He looked through a primitive microscope at what he thought was a simple cell. He couldn't see the electric impulse driven molecular motors whirring around in each cell taking out the cellular garbage. ABOVE
Rate of pace of growing mountains, crumbling cliffs and arches, rate of increasing salinity in the oceans etc. belie millions of years since creation. A global flood?
The Age of Aquarius? The planets do not support billions. They are supposed to be old and cold but aren’t.
Fraud, fraud, fraud and still more fraud, “The Scopes Monkey Trial”, National Geographic etc. My own story: My 1966 high school debate- Evolution vs Creation. It failed as a debate. The opponents agreed with evolution, based on the same document now known to be fraudulent.
How can stars be millions of light years away if the universe was created only a about 6000 years ago The problem of red light shift, etc.
The Big Bang Theory? NOT settled science. Not even worthy of being called a theory as it relies on yet to be discovered laws of science!
Carbon and Rock Dating. How does it work? How can the scientifically measurable millions and billions be reconciled with the Bible’s claim of thousands of years? Carbon-14 has been found within diamonds, which makes an age of hundreds of millions of years impossible.
40 tiny molecular cellular machines
1. Bacterial Flagellum Each item below has a description if you go to the source. 40
2. Eukaryotic Cilium
3. Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases (aaRS)
4. Blood clotting cascade
5. Ribosome
6. Antibodies and the Adaptive Immune System
7. Spliceosome
8. F0F1 ATP Synthase
9. Bacteriorhdopsin
10. Myosin
11. Kinesin Motor
12. Tim/Tom Systems
13. Calcium Pump
14. Cytochrome C Oxidase
15. Proteosome
16. Cohesin
17. Condensin
18. ClpX
19. Immunological Synapse
20. Glideosome
21. Kex2
22. Hsp70
23. Hsp60
24. Protein Kinase C
25. SecYEG PreProtein Translocation Channel
26. Hemoglobin
27. T4 DNA Packaging Motor
28. Smc5/Smc6
29. Cytplasmic Dynein
30. Mitotic Spindle Machine
31. DNA Polymerase
32. RNA Polymerase
33. Kinetochore
34. MRX Complex
35. Apoptosome / Caspase
36. Type III Secretory System
37. Type II Secretion Apparatus
38. Helicase/Topoisomerase Machine
39. RNA degradasome
40. Photosynthetic system.
(follow this link for the description of each of these items 40 )