Prochoice Benefits from Trump win. 7 examples
(Almost) all prochoice people will be happier and healthier under Trump. Really!
Trump’s win is actually great news for prochoice women. (And their children)
Choice depends on awareness of the options. But those options have been intentionally blocked from prochoice women.
Under Trump a broad range of repressed health truth will emerge. The result will be improved wealth, health, and happiness
Trump’s win, despite Time magazine’s pronouncement of a loss of freedom, is just the opposite. A return to freedom. Under Biden-Harris and earlier administrations, free speech was crushed. Important science was repressed because it didn’t support “The Narrative”.
Free speech-including open and transparent medical information- will lead to happier and healthier women and children. The empirical data supports that statement.
So why the prochoice fear? It comes out of the collapse of Roe v. Wade. But what actually happened? Most of us don't know the important part.
The USA constitution demands that even it's preborn citizens are protected. Yes the preborn are acknowledged to have value, so the courts can't simply change the law and allow abortion.
So to justify allowing the termination of a human life protected by the Constitution, the original Roe v. Wade argued, using cherry picked medical data, that an "Abortion is safer than childbirth" for the pregnant woman.
This mere idea, suggested without medical evidence, was utilized to justify abortion. (Pg. 291 Marion faux, Roe v Wade) (There was never any doubt that the preborn are fully human from the moment of conception. No dispute there.)
Eventually the flawed court decision was overturned-- remember the expression, "the truth comes out”–in part by the complete set of medical risks data being presented to some new judiciaries willing to re-hear the Roe v. Wade.
Genuinely prochoice women want to have pertinent information at their fingertips as they make any decision including their abortion decision. That is implied in the word “choice”. But prochoice women have NOT had that knowledge as they made their decision.
Now, under Trump that information will be allowed-indeed encouraged- to come out.
Let me give you some examples of this buried health information and other ways women will benefit under Trump.
1: Preterm birth
The incidence of preterm birth has been increasing. It can be devastating to the family with overwhelming medical expenses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars plus endless medical appointments.
The stress is so high most marriages break down leaving the mother to carry the heavy load alone.
As for the child? It’s a life sentence because preterm birth leads to various conditions such as cerebral palsy, autism, deafness or blindness. The “lucky” child gets off with “merely” a learning disability.


If you were a woman pondering pregnancy would you want to know how to avoid health circumstances that could result in a preterm birth? You bet you would.
But what are the causes of preterm birth? Would the discovery of them be newsworthy if you were a media publisher? Of course.
Award winning Canadian Dr. Prakesh S. Shah, (Neonatologist and Clinical Epidemiologist, Associate Professor, Departments of Paediatrics and HPME, University of Toronto , Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario) noticed a great and continuing increase in the highly dangerous births of premature and underweight babies.
He did a major study covering nearly one million births to determine if there was an identifiable cause. He discovered one; The side effect of one of the world’s most common elective medical procedures.
Now if he had found that say, drinking too much apple juice during pregnancy was the culprit he would have been hailed as a hero.
But the culprit was not something innocuous like apple juice. It was induced abortion, the medically preferred method to terminate a pregnancy.
The research discovered that in “women who had undergone more than one abortion, there was a 72% increased risk for low birth weight and 93% for prematurity”.
He called a press conference to share this stunning news and suggest more research to find a safer way to terminate a pregnancy. But no media came from Canada, the USA, or anywhere else in the world. The mainstream media does not want to carry any story that might undermine a woman’s right to an abortion. Even his own hospital did not feature his discovery on their research brag page. Only the proudly independent UK Guardian carried the news. theguardian
Anyone who talks “choice” has to ask why the mainstream media is prefers to sacrifice the health of women and children to maintain the “higher” narrative of free and easy abortion rights
Does the FDA know of this risk and warn of it? Yes they know of it. No they don’t warn women. The American government’s own library contains a research book entirely dedicated to Pre-term birth. It confirms the abortion risk.
If you turn to page 644 and 645 of the pdf of the 750 page book in the repository of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences- the institute the American government relies on for its decision making, you see these charts: (free download preterm-birth )
Does the FDA demand warnings of this politically sensitive side effect? No. It only warns of the politically safe side effects: Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol.
Notice that cigarette smoking and alcohol during pregnancy are in those lists so the government knew what was there
Through the FDA’s refusal to list elective abortion as a contributor to Autism and Cerebral Palsy from preterm birth, the mainstream media (MSM) narrative of pro-choice regardless of health risks, is maintained.
The very real health risks are mocked in the MSM on the rare occasion they actually get mentioned: For example, “The Seven Most Common Lies About Abortion- Debunking anti-choice misinformation about women’s health, February 26, 2014, seven-most-common-lies
There are numerous health risks to the woman choosing abortion that I won’t dig into here as they are well covered in my other videos:
Ectopic pregnancy (which is hard to detect so kills many women),
depression,
substance abuse and suicide,
infertility and others.
Below is the trailer for 4 Ways Critical…
see more at Keith Neely videos
(above video- post abortion women share their stores- they were not given the choices)
Example #2; Women duped into getting “safe and effective” covid vaccines which actually damages them and their babies
Long after the Pfizer documents have been shown to never claim that they reduced the spread of covid nor that they were safe for women, long after accurate and complete medical records from jurisdictions like Ontario Canada reveal that the vaccines damage women, governments like the Ontario one continue to claim that they are healthy and necessary. Proving malicious intent on the part of the original pharmaceutical product is more difficult, but proving malevolent intent on the part of the Ontario Government late 2024 should be easier as it continues to refuse to look at their own health records revealing the damage. (see above video)
At the same time the government continues to tell me to get covid vaccinated.
Example # 3—CDC, Center of Disease Control failure to disclose autism risks to black kids
In June 2021, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson posted a 2014 letter from a senior CDC researcher who claims he and his colleagues destroyed data indicating a link between a vaccine and autism in African-American boys. Dr. William Thompson, who’s still a Senior Scientist at CDC, said he and his colleagues agreed to remove any “race effects” from a 2004 paper published in the Journal of Pediatrics”. the-morning-brew Why did they feel they needed to deceive? To fit the narrative that vaccinations are safe, effective and extremely necessary.
Example # 4 : Scientists afraid to speak out for fear of mockery by others in the media.
Canadian scientist Alina Chan confessed that she and fellow researchers held back on publicly supporting the Wuhan Lab Leak Theory for COVID simply because they didn’t want to be seen as siding with Trump. morning-brew If you speak out against the narrative you will be mocked just like the Rolling Stone mocking of abortion risks. This leads to self-censorship of important evidence.
Example #5: In “Lies, Newsweek and control of the media narrative: First-hand account”
Tareq Haddad was trying to get a story published as a journalist employed by Newsweek about a very important aspect of the Iraq war. But “I was given a simple choice. On one hand, I could continue to be employed by the company, stay in their chic London offices and earn a steady salary—only if I adhered to what could or could not be reported and suppressed vital facts. Alternatively, I could leave the company and tell the truth.” newsweek-and-control
Example #6: Whatever the FDA says dictates what is real vs. fake news.
More recently, November 3 2021, to be precise, the trustworthy British Medical Journal reported that Pfizer acted fraudulently
in their Covid vaccine testing and that the FDA ignored reports of that accusation even as the FDA recommended acceptance of the vaccine to their panel. Dr Michael Tomlinson a governance and quality assurance consultant says that this evidence, "Destroys the credibility of the research". In a message he goes onto explain, "It is the reddest of red flags. FDA knew about it and are culpable for not even mentioning it in their brief to the advisory committee that recommended approval." He goes on to point out, "Remember too that Pfizer led by the nose the authors of the trial report published in the NEJM: 'Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript." whistleblower
An update to this came a couple days ago. (November 2024) A massive data dump from a whistle blower at the German equivalent of the USA CDC revealed the truth behind the above paragraph and more:
The entire covid vaccination scheme including lock downs and social pressure to vaccinate was based on politics and greed from above our government, not medicine:
FLCCC Alliance expands on this
We the public treat the FDA as infallible. They, along with other branches of the American administration successfully and illegally shut down the normal allowance for dissension from medial authorities during Covid.
They are unduly influenced by outside powers including “Big Pharma”. Women were/are being damaged by big Pharma corruption with the covid vaccines as well as other pharmaceutical products that were allowed to linger in the marketplace far longer than the safety evidence justified.
Example #7; Can we trust the pharmaceutical industry? Its seems that the entire industry has a criminal record.
This list of courtroom convictions was at Wikipedia where the phrase “false claims” appears in 20 of the 21 entries in the far right column, and “criminal component” appears 15 of 21 entries. Physicians and others are bribed to issue more use prescriptions than might be necessary.
Wikipedia Hmm- the above chart was at this link 21/09/02. However, that link a few months later shows the almost identical chart but
the word “criminal” has been removed in all but one conviction. Who really runs Wikipedia?
3 of 4 of Canada’s Covid 19 suppliers are on this list: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson. (treatments/vaccines) Canadians were all but forced at gun point to get the covid vaccinations- from companies with criminal records for fraud. Unless you were vaxed hospitals were refusing treatment, employers were terminating you, you were prohibited from seeing your mother in her nursing home and you could not get on a train or plane. While your friends could enter a restaurant. You could not.
The one covid company not on the illegal actions list, which should not automatically imbue it with good guy status. Moderna, had no commercial products prior to their Covid Vaccine. It was criticized in 2018 by its investors, for secrecy and the absence of scientific validation or independent peer-review of its research, Moderna
Under inordinate pressure citizens were accepting a virtually untested and radically different product injected into their bodies. This is in violation of a long list of court cases and laws. Why was it allowed?
Under the Trump administration with RFK jr. at HHS a wide range of corruption in our health matters will be revealed. The net result will be that women and their children will be healthier and happier. (And of course men also but this particular edition is for women)