In this blog: The belief in evolution was/is the justification of Nazism and other present day tyrannies and medical experimentation to justify their abuses and create an elite group of superior people. The Rockefeller book (“Rockefeller-Controlling-Game”) speaks of this on page 14, 25,27,29,88 as well as many other places. Why? The masses aren’t competent to run their lives or their country (pg. 288). The elites are working towards a super person- “God-like” to run things. (pg.304) The elites are not only “justified” in taking charge they are “obligated” to do so. But one simple fact alone, CRUSHES the theory of evolution. Other “isms” like climatism and globalism also depend on this lie.
(Not covered in this blog per se but for your background information: Thousands of NGOs- Non governmental organizations, supported by elite money, not the grass roots money they present themselves as being supported by, work against our rights, freedoms and comforts in life like air conditioning and driving a car beyond the “15 minute city” . These NGOs work to undermine the benefit of humankind making the regular people the problem rather than the solution to our problems. This philosophy justifies all the destructive acts we have been subjected to such as the narrative, “By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy”. All of this comes from the philosophy of evolution which in removing God and all the rights and freedoms HE bestows, leaves their world open for their control and crushing laws.
By way of background, the blog, “The Broken Wall of Science” is exposing how the broken wall of ethics that used to separate ethical, honest science from dishonest “science”, has collapsed.
The number of research articles retracted in 2023 hit an all-time high, with over 10,000 papers pulled for fraudulent practices. The fraud ranges from images recycled from previous papers to entirely fabricated datasets. The sham papers aren’t only annoying, they’re harmful to scientific fields and in some cases even dangerous. Such academic cheating may be driven in large part by the strong career pressure researchers face to publish frequently.
The number of papers retracted increased more than five-fold between 2013 and 2023, according to a Nature analysis. A 2012 study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that two-thirds of retracted biomedical and life sciences papers were withdrawn due to misconduct, including fraud, duplicate publication, and plagiarism.
Besançon argues the body of fraudulent research is actually far greater than what’s being retracted. “Ultimately we’re just catching the easy-to-catch ones,” he said. research
But the problem is that whatever false science was published, continues to be heard throughout the intended audience- like the rings in the water from a pebble thrown in spreading outwards.
The narrative these falsified studies support carries the fraudulent, money driven “science” onwards and outwards to accomplish its goals.
If a retraction is made, unlike the original headlined false study, the retraction is in small print buried many pages into the publication. Yes this really happens. Intentionally.
There are numerous books which detail how this occurs. A new book, Rockefeller: Controlling the Game is excellent. Rockefeller-Controlling-Game
What The Broken Wall of Science contributes to truth sleuthing is that it goes to the root cause.
This new series of blogs on creation is revealing the foundational frauds and the crushed science that destroyed our culture of ethics and created fertile soil for the false science to thrive in.
Blog number 2 is about how DNA reveals we are de-volving not evolving. This fact alone destroys the philosophy of evolution.
First, a quick review of blog 1: Problematic to scientists struggling to prove evolution, is the overwhelming evidence that the recent past (the last few thousand not millions of years,) revealed dinosaurs walked with humans. Here is the problem they have with the “dinosaurs-before-humans” claim. Blog 1 showed dinos are recent enough that sculptors and other artists, a few hundred years back, had actual visual contact with the smaller versions of the once giant dinosaurs which roamed earth along side humankind.
A portion of the Bible describes a Sauropod. I am not aware of anyone who argues that the description was not written down 3000 years before the Sauropod was first unearthed. Sauropod described 3000 years ago
Dinosaur bones continue to be found that are so young they smell of rotten meat. But instead of scientists changing their minds to acknowledge recent dinos they struggle to come up with a new law of biology to explain it why the blood and DNA filled bones are not mineralized after millions of years. dinosaur-soft-tissue
For background I need to address an important question: Ancient dating:
In exactly the same way as the scientists who had an opposing view of the Covid 19 infection were pushed from inside the giant tent of “The Science” and losing their credentials and careers in the process, the giant tent of the origins of the earth and the universe, pushed to the outside, the scientists who, forced by the empirical evidence, attribute creation to God / Intelligent Design instead of naturalism: The earth and universe is millions/billions of years old and changing extremely slowly. They are not necessarily religious people.
To this very day, the problems – the empirical measurable scientific problems with explaining the ever growing mountain of evidence for the immense complexity of the universe and the animal kingdom- the ever growing problem explaining that regardless of the measurable science revealing the immense problem of it evolving somehow, there is a simple wave of the hand with the dismissive comment, “it evolved through time”.
The growing number of scientists brave enough to publicly argue that time can’t accomplish it, are are silenced by their inability to get research grants with that perspective. Hence they are not invited to participate in the “Big Tent”. They are relegated to the little tent even though their measurable observable science explains what is happening far better, far more neatly and cleanly, than the science in the Big Tent.
I will explain this more in the months ahead (planned for blog 7 and 9) but for now let me give a couple examples of the problems the scientists speaking in the Big Tent have with the measurable, observable science.
Explaining this will ready you for the radical truth of this blog: The volcanic action of the exploding Mount St Helens in 1980 and Surtsey island, Iceland, being born 1963. It formed as the lava from a deep sea volcano broke through the ocean’s surface..
But the rocks of Mount St. Helen-formed 1980, date as more than 2 million years old
Surtsey island? 1963. Scientists assumed it would take thousands of years to naturalize. It took only a decade.
On Surtsey only a few months sufficed for a landscape to be created which was so varied and mature that it was almost beyond belief … wide sandy beaches … precipitous crags … gravel banks and lagoons, impressive cliffs grayish white from the brine …hollows … glens and screes… boulders worn by the surf, some of which were almost round on an abrasion platform cut into the cliffs.’l surtsey
And, according to a January 2006 article in New Scientist, Surtsey continues to surprise: ‘The island has excited geographers, who marvel that canyons, gullies and other land features that typically take tens of thousands or millions of years to form were created in less than a decade.’ …And biologists, too, have been surprised. ‘From the first, the speed, ingenuity and sheer unpredictability of nature’s colonisation of Surtsey wrong-footed them.’ For example, it was not the expected lichens and mosses which were the ‘early invaders’, but flowering plants. surtsey-still-surprises
Devolving, not Evolving-that’s what DNA shows
Genetic entropy: the silent killer, A devastatingly powerful argument against evolution
Generally speaking, entropy is the universal tendency for things to run down and fall apart.1
Not surprisingly, the same tendency is at work in entire populations, generation after generation. We now know, thanks largely to the work of Dr John Sanford (renowned plant geneticist and genetic engineering pioneer from Cornell University), that the same gradual process of ‘running down’ is also operating in the human gene pool.
Called genetic entropy, it is driving humanity—and all higher organisms—to the point of extinction (barring divine intervention, of course).2 In fact, this process, which operates more rapidly in ‘higher’ organisms,3 means that the human species could only be several thousand years old; certainly not hundreds of thousands of years, or we would have already become extinct. genetic-entropy
We have been taught that through genetic mutations we evolved from one cell organisms, then to chimps, then to humans; from pond slime struck by a lightning bolt to the biologist who studies pond slime.
It is simply a matter of time, apparently.
The problem is we are mutating with destructive mutations at a faster rate than the so called helpful mutations can fix us.
In reality, any thought that the slime could become a biologist over time, should have died with the discovery of DNA. Its the blue print that precedes- that dictates what is growing- how fast and how big etc. It can be the DNA for a corn stock or the DNA for a human. The DNA comes first and dictates the growth from the seed or embryo.
However, the evolutionary community wasn’t ready to say “we were wrong”
so they gained hope from the observation of ongoing mutations. They declared that there are some “good mutations” that give rise to the ever higher and smarter outcomes of evolution, given enough time.
But to use an analogy of a broken down recreational vehicle, evolution says breakdowns (mutations) can be beneficial.
For example while the RV rolls off the assembly line in perfect condition, over time and mileage the
engine finally dies and is unfixable. The “benefit” of that “mutation” to the evolutionary philosopher is that you no longer need to put gasoline in the RV, thereby saving money.
When the stove and fridge in the RV “mutate” you can now have the pleasure of eating out all the time.
When a lightning bolt knocks out the electrical system the “mutation” means your air conditioning has died but the benefit is that you can now save money by towing the RV to a campground site that has no electricity, saving you even more money.
Now without air conditioning, when a mutation during a vicious storm knocks the door off the RV, the “benefit” of the mutation is lots of ventilation.
No mutations add to the designed operation of the organism. Every mutation takes away from it. There is a loss of function. A loss of information. Only “spin doctors” not scientists, are able to make this negative fact into a positive, and claim these losses as “evidence” of evolution.
The philosophy of evolution, purified to its fundamentals, stripped of the pretense of science says, “throw down a pile of sand and in time it will overcome the law of entropy and become a computer, throw down bits and pieces of iron and in time it will assemble itself into a lawnmower.”
There is NO evidence of evolution meaning working towards MORE information and moving away from the law of entropy. ALL mutations are consistent with that law.
Let me move on from the broken down RV analogy into the real world of science and examples of the so called “benefits” of mutations.
“Mutations are accidental changes in the DNA.” Evolution depends on mutations to create ever more complex life forms but in fact “Mutations are wrecking things. In fact there are over 500,000 mutations identified that cause disease. And mutations are killing us not creating us. And this is a fundamental problem.
“Biology teachers could perhaps be excused for perpetuating such a naïve belief. They simply assumed that the easily observable genetic changes in many types of living populations were an obvious demonstration that evolution from microbes to man was fact. Just give it enough time, and voilà, such ‘micro’ changes would accumulate, continually filtered and guided by natural selection. It seemed obvious and logical to expect these ‘little steps’ to keep adding up so as to lead to the ‘macro’ changes—the really big jumps, frog-to-prince, fish-to-philosopher, that type of thing. (As we will show later in this article, though, the very opposite is true.)… What we need to be aware of, and focus on in our answers, I tell audiences, is not the amount of change, but the type or direction of change. It is not just that the train (of time) has not gone far enough, but that it is headed in the wrong direction.…
(editors note- the train analogy was that it was leaving the New York city station and in time would get to its destination, Chicago, even though it would take a long time)
Evolutionists teach that one-celled organisms6 (e.g. protozoa) have given rise to pelicans, pomegranates, people and ponies. In each case, the DNA ‘recipe’ has had to undergo a massive net increase of information during the alleged millions of years. A one-celled organism does not have the instructions for how to manufacture eyes, ears, blood, skin, hooves, brains, etc. which ponies need. So for protozoa to have given rise to ponies, there would have to be some mechanism that gives rise to new information.
Evolutionists hail natural selection as if it were a creative goddess, but the reality (which they invariably concede when pressed) is that selection on its own always gets rid of information, never the opposite.7To have a way to add information, the ‘only game in town’ for evolution’s true believers is genetic copying mistakes or accidents, i.e. random mutations (which can then be ‘filtered’ by selection).8 However, the problem is that if mutations were capable of adding the information required, we should see hundreds of examples all around us, considering that there are many thousands of mutations happening continually. But whenever we study mutations, they invariably turn out to have lost or degraded the information. This is so even in those rare instances when the mutational defect gives a survival advantage—e.g. the loss of wings on beetles on windy islands.9
…In other words, populations can change and adapt because they have a lot of information (variety) in their DNA ‘recipe’. But unless mutations can feed in new information, each time there is variation/adaptation, the total information decreases (as selection gets rid of the unadapted portions of the population, some information is lost in that population). Thus, given a fixed amount of information, the more adaptation we see, the less the potential for future adaptation. The train is definitely headed downhill, destined to fall off the jetty of extinction. The supreme irony is that, of all the examples lauded by Dr Coyne as ‘evolution’, whether antibiotic resistance12 or changes in fish growth rates, not one single one supports his ‘train’ analogy, but rather the reverse. Not one involves a gain of information; all show the opposite, a net loss. train-a-cominmutation-accumulation
The mutations evolution teaches are necessary climbing ever higher are in fact, the reverse of that. Mutations never add more helpful genetic information. It is always a negative action even if it has, in a tiny fraction of cases, a beneficial side effect in a specific situation. It is those precious few benefits that teachers of evolution focus on, to justify their philosophy.
“However, directly contradicting mutation’s central role in life’s diversity, we have seen growing experimental evidence that mutations destroy life. In medical circles, mutations are universally regarded as deleterious. They are a fundamental cause of ageing,2,3 cancer4,5 and infectious diseases.6
…Even among evolutionary apologists who search for examples of mutations that are beneficial, the best they can do is to cite damaging mutations that have beneficial side effects (e.g. sickle-cell trait,7 a 32-base-pair deletion in a human chromosome that confers HIV resistance to homozygotes and delays AIDS onset in heterozygotes,8CCR5–delta32 mutation,9 animal melanism,10 and stickleback pelvic spine suppression11). Such results are not at all surprising in the light of the discovery that DNA undergoes up to a million damage and repair events per cell per day.12
…Thus, all multicellular life on earth is undergoing inexorable genome decay because the deleterious mutation rates are so high, the effects of the most individual mutations are so small, there are no compensatory beneficial mutations, and natural selection is ineffective in removing the damage.”
…Fifty human generations of 20 years each gives us only 1,000 years as a timescale over which a human lineage would begin to experience a significant mutation load in its genome. This is alarmingly rapid compared with the supposed evolutionary time scale of millions and billions of years.”
…A single human lifetime is enough to show very significant mutation damage, even in our reproductive cells.”
…The measured difference between the human and chimpanzee genomes amounts to about 125 million nucleotides, which are thought to have arisen from about 40 million mutation events.29If only 1000 of these mutations could have been naturally selected to produce the new (human) species, it means the other 39,999,000 mutations were deleterious, which is completely consistent with the reviews showing that the vast majority of mutations are deleterious. Consequently, we must have degenerated from the apes, which is an absurd conclusion.”
…In a study of 2,823 human metabolic pathways, 96% produced disease conditions when disrupted by mutation,33 “ mutations-evolutions-end“33” is Ma, H., et al., The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis, Molecular Systems Biology 3, Article number 135; published online, 2007, <www.molecularsystemsbiology.com>.
So in contrast to the evolutionary philosophy that teaches that we are always growing better, in fact, all of the earth is locked in decay. Even the Bible talks of this; in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay decay
But why does this matter today ?
You have likely heard the phrase “mitochondrial eve”
The whole issue with genetic mutations is that the growing problem of the increasing number of mutations points us back to a time when we did not have mutations.
In fact, even more intriguing is that genetics reveals that everyone on earth came from a single woman, referred to as “Eve”.
Scientists, not accepting the Genesis creation account of a single Adam and Eve, assume there were other humans who failed to keep reproducing or who were integrated into the present human race.
When the rate of decay -the rate of mutations is projected back, some geneticists put the date of mitochondrial Eve, the time when our genomes were without mutations, at about 6000 years ago.
Its pretty crazy that the Bible and genetics agree todays humans started 6000 years ago. Yet those scientists won’t give any credence to the Bible. That would cost far too much. real-eve
But being unwilling to pay that price has an even greater cost in two ways.
A/ Ownership rights and the law: If you come across a relatively new but abandoned car you may hope that no one owns it because then you can claim it.
I remember the numerous cars when I moved to Buffalo NY for university that were abandoned curbside by their owners. Locals were free to strip them of anything useful.
Who “owns” us? Because we evolved from the swamp, those with power can treat us like slime. Enslave us. Overpower us with forced dangerous vaccines and unscientific lockdowns etc. Why? Because there is no higher authority for them to answer to. We are the abandoned cars of the inner city.
We see this in action today. Biology reveals that the pre-born baby is as human as you and I but it is not given any rights, by those in power, until it takes its first breath. Our rights are not inherent or “self-evident” to those who live by the philosophy of evolution.
Do you think I am stretching this point- that the belief in evolution was the justification of Nazism used to “purify” the human races, to create an elite group of super people? The Rockefeller book I referenced (“Rockefeller-Controlling-Game”) speaks of this on page 14, 25,27,29,88. The masses aren’t competent to run their lives or their country (pg. 288). The elites are working towards a super person- “God-like” to run things. (304)
Overall, the global elites, claiming supremacy and believing in the survival and right, indeed, duty of the “fittest” to govern the rest, believe in de-population to lower the carbon “poisoning”. (There is no science to support this fear- just philosophy but that’s another topic)
Because of the health and climate “crisis” they believe they have the right, like in actual wartime, to take charge and command us to do whatever they think is justified. We experienced that under Covid. (Honest science does not claim there is no change in the weather pattens- just that (1) we have had warmer temperatures and higher oceans in the recent past before we had our present population, and (2) That empirical science does not support carbon increases as dangerous and (3) that the rate of change is not even close to the projected fearmongering rates in “The Inconvenient Truth” See…
Conversely if we look at the evidence for intelligent design and the evidence that the the Bible is an amazing and accurate book, we can acknowledge God. We can believe that the God of the Bible who claims to have created us, thereby owns us. We can accept that we are protected by him and his words to us- the Bible- as we look to it for guidance on creating laws for today.
Unlike the caricature of God, God is loving and wants the very best for your life and mine. His presence dispels fear. Scientists are free to explore all of His creation properly assuming they will fine order and creativity.
You can see the results of us abandoning God and the Bible in our society. We have chaos. “What is Fair?” ask this headline as a girls volleyball team dispute the rights of trans men to compete against them. As you likely know men are about 30 percent stronger apparently on average and in things like boxing, their punch is 30% faster. That is an enormous advantage when spiking a volleyball. define-fair Conversely with the Bible we have a foundation to establish “fair” “God did this to demonstrate his righteousness, for he himself is fair and just,…” Bible fair
B/ But the biggest loss in our collective refusal to acknowledge God in creation is that he made us to have a relationship with Him and therefore a better life now and forever.
Just as an architect would be offended if we said to him, as he/she took us on a tour of a house he designed and built, “It’s amazing what time can create” God is offended by the claims of evolution. That breaks our relationship with Him.
Hear the call for relationship here. After Adam and Eve were created, God would visit them in their beautiful gardens:
When the cool evening breezes were blowing, the man and his wife heard the LORD God walking about in the garden. So they hid from the LORD God among the trees. Then the LORD God called to the man, “Where are you?” where are you vs. 8
You may know that conversation marked the end of their time in the garden of Eden. Adam and Eve had refused to keep one simple request- surrounded by all the delicious food they could freely eat , (without killing any animal) they selected the one they had been told not to eat. It is a fascinating read and online resources like Bible Hub are there with virtually endless help to reveal how all 66 books in the library called the Bible inter-connect with each other, even though they were written over a period of about 1200 years. how many years
Acknowledging God created is the first step in breaking the bondage the Global elites have over us and the first step to a a warm relationship with Jesus no matter what else you believe at this point in time.
I hope you have enjoyed reading this. Feel free to ask me to respond to you directly and personally.
Re "Do you think I am stretching this point- that the belief in evolution was the justification of Nazism used to “purify” the human races, to create an elite group of super people?"
No, I don't, I have said something similar myself for some time. I see the undermining of the truth of an architect designed, God designed, world as the fundamental cause of what we see today. As is written, "Professing to be wise, they became fools"
I welcome your thoughts and questions
Very good, thank you.
Re "Do you think I am stretching this point- that the belief in evolution was the justification of Nazism used to “purify” the human races, to create an elite group of super people?"
No, I don't, I have said something similar myself for some time. I see the undermining of the truth of an architect designed, God designed, world as the fundamental cause of what we see today. As is written, "Professing to be wise, they became fools"